Modavox, Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc.

Filing 378

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING YAHOO!'S SECOND BILL OF COSTS. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/2/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)

1 [SEE SIGNATURE PAGE FOR COMPLETE LIST OF COUNSEL]
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11

AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.

STIPULATION REGARDING YAHOO!
INC.’S SECOND BILL OF COSTS

YAHOO! INC.,

Judge: Hon. Magistrate Joseph C. Spero

Defendant.
YAHOO! INC.,

16
17
18
19
20

CASE NO. C 09-5386 JCS

Counterclaim Plaintiff,
v.
AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and
WORLD TALK RADIO, LLC,
Counterclaim Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING YAHOO! INC.’S SECOND BILL OF COSTS
sf-3233172

Case No. C 09-5386 JCS

Pursuant to Civil L. R. 7-12 and 54, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby

1

2 stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows:
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2012, the Court entered judgment for Yahoo! Inc.

3

4 (“Yahoo!”) on Yahoo!’s counterclaim that Augme Technologies, Inc. (“Augme”) and World Talk
5 Radio LLC (“WTR”) infringe claims 1-2, 4, 7-8 and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 7,640,320 (the “’320
6 Patent”), except for an accounting, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(2). (ECF No. 365.);
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2012, Yahoo! timely served and filed an administrative

7

8 motion to seal a Second Bill of Costs pertaining to Yahoo!’s patent infringement claims. (ECF
9 No. 372.) In its Second Bill of Costs, Yahoo! identified $22,874.33 in costs taxable to Augme.
10 (Id.);
11

WHEREAS, on December 21, 2012, Augme and WTR informed Yahoo! that they objected

12 to $210 in costs identified by Yahoo!;
13

WHEREAS, Yahoo! agrees to waive $210 of the costs it sought;

14

THEREFORE, Yahoo!, Augme, and WTR stipulate and request as follows:

15

1.

That Yahoo! timely served and filed its second bill of costs.

16

2.

That Augme and WTR timely objected to Yahoo!’s second bill of costs.

17

3.

That $22,664.33 in costs is properly taxable against Augme and WTR, pertaining to
Yahoo!’s patent infringement claims.

18
19
20

4.

That the Clerk of Court tax costs in the amount of $22,664.33 against Augme and
WTR.

21 It is so STIPULATED.
22
23
24
25
26
27

Dated: December 27, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Gregory S. Bishop__________
Thomas J. Scott Jr. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Jennifer A. Albert (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
901 New York Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20001

28
2
STIPULATION REGARDING YAHOO! INC.’S SECOND BILL OF COSTS
sf-3233172

Case No. C 09-5386 JCS

1

Tel.: [phone]; Fax: [phone]

2

Erica D. Wilson (161386)
[e-mail]
Gregory S. Bishop (184680)
[e-mail]
Charles F. Koch (256683)
[e-mail]
Daniel Willis Richards (280595)
[e-mail]
Ruchi W. Kwatra (270905)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025-1105
Tel.: [phone]; Fax: [phone]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Michael G. Strapp (pro hac vice)
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Exchange Place
53 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Tel.: [phone]; Fax: [phone]

10
11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant AUGME TECHNOLOGIES and
Counterclaim Defendant WORLD TALK
RADIO, LLC

13
14
15
Dated: December 27, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

By: /s/ Richard S.J. Hung
Rachel Krevans (116421)
[e-mail]
Richard S.J. Hung (197425)
[e-mail]
Daniel P. Muino (209624)
[e-mail]
J. Ryan Gilfoil (246493)
[e-mail]
John K. Blake, Jr. (262906)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street, 32nd Floor,
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff YAHOO! INC.

27
28
3
STIPULATION REGARDING YAHOO! INC.’S SECOND BILL OF COSTS
sf-3233172

Case No. C 09-5386 JCS

1
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURES
2
I, John K. Blake, Jr., am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this
3
4

STIPULATION REGARDING YAHOO! INC.’S SECOND BILL OF COSTS
In compliance with Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Gregory S. Bishop and Richard S.J.

5
Hung have concurred to its filing.
6
Dated: December 27, 2012
7

/s/ John K. Blake, Jr._______

8
S

ER

R NIA
FO

Spero

LI

Judge Jo

H

14

RT

13

seph C.

NO

12

Dated: Jan. 2, 2013

ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

A

11

UNIT
ED

10

RT
U
O

9

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION REGARDING YAHOO! INC.’S SECOND BILL OF COSTS
sf-3233172

Case No. C 09-5386 JCS