Vidal v. Specialty Restaurant Corporation

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 27 Stipulation filed by Specialty Restaurant Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/10/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2010)

John M. Cowden (State Bar No. 224963) JACKSON LEWIS LLP 2 199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, California 94105
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone] 4 Attorneys for Defendant
SPECIALTY

RESTAURAT CORPORATION

5

BROWNSTEIN THOMAS, LLP

6 MARK C. THOMAS SBN: 215580
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 940
7 San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: [phone]
8 Facsimile: 415-986-1231

9 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Guillermo Vidal
io
11

12 -13

~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO.: CV 09 5414 EMC

14

15 GUILLERMO VIDAL, an individual,
16

17 vs.
18

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CTION WITH PREJUICE AND ORDER
Judge: The Hon. Edward M. Chen Dept: C

SPECIALTY RESTAURAT

19 CORPORATION, a California corporation,

20 Defendant.
21

22
23

24
25 26 27
28

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUICE - 1

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and a settlement

2 reached by the parties plaintiff Guilermo Vidal ("Plaintiff") and defendant Specialty Restaurant
3 Corporation ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to
4 and request a dismissal with prejudice of this entire action, including any and all claims and
5 causes of action alleged against any and all defendants, with each pary to bear its own attorney's

6 fees and costs.
7
8

9 IT is SO STIPULATED.
10
11

Dated: August 5, 2010

12
13

BY:~
By:

BROWNSTEIN THOMAS, LLP

14
15

Mark C. Thomas

Attorneys for Plaitiff

16
17 18

Dated: August 5, 2010

19

20
21

~

John M. Cowden Attorney for Defendant

22
23

24
25

26 27 28

STIPULA nON AND (pROPOSED) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - 2

Based on the stipulation of

the parties and good cause appearing, IT is HEREBY

2 ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and each pary will bear its own costs and
3

attorneys' fees.
DATED:

5

7

8

9

10
11

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

12
13

14
15

16 17
18

19

20
21

22
23

24 25

26
27
28

snpULA nON AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - 3

A

C

LI

FO

dwar Judge E

d M. Ch

en

R NIA

6

THE HON. EDWARD M. RDERED CHEN OO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE IT IS S

UNIT ED

4

8/10/10

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

NO

RT

H