Milligan et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al

Filing 82

ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/2/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181 Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC 936 North 34th Street, Suite 400 Seattle, Washington 98103-8869 Telephone: (206) 816-6603 Facsimile: (206) 350-3528 Jeffrey B. Cereghino, CSB #099480 Email: jcereghino@merrillnomura.com MERRILL, NOMURA & MOLINEUX LLP 350 Rose Street Danville, California 94526 Telephone: (925) 833-1000 Facsimile: (925) 833-1001 10 [Additional counsel appear on signature page] 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Class 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 CARIN and GEORGE EDWIN MILLIGAN, California residents, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 19 20 NO. C09-05418 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL v. (Clerk’s Action Required) 21 22 TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California corporation and TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, 23 Defendant. 24 25 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL - 1 CASE NO. C09-05418 RS CLASS ACTION 1 WHEREAS, on January 6, 2012, the Court entered an Order Granting Final Approval of 2 Class Action Settlement and Granting Award of Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Incentive 3 Payments to Class Representatives (Dkt. 80), which Order is incorporated herein by reference; 4 WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement requires that the Court enter certain findings; 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 6 1. 7 8 9 The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action, all members of the Settlement Class and Defendant; 2. The proposed Class meets Rule 23’s requirements and certification is appropriate for settlement purposes only. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) 10 and 23(b)(3), the Court has certified, for settlement purposes only, the following class: 11 All persons in the United States, including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, who currently own or lease or who previously owned or leased a model-year 2001-2003 Toyota RAV4 vehicle with automatic transmissions (“Class Vehicle”). Excluded from the Settlement Class are the following: a) officers and directors of Toyota (as defined below) b) the Judge to whom this case is assigned and any member of the Judge’s immediate family; and c) persons who have submitted a timely and valid request for exclusion from the Settlement Class; 12 13 14 15 16 17 3. The Named Plaintiffs and Class Counsel have fairly and adequately represented 18 the interests of the Settlement Class Members at all times in this case and in the related action 19 of Washington v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc.; 20 21 22 4. The proposed Class Settlement is the result of arm’s length negotiations and is fair, reasonable, and adequate; 5. The form and manner of disseminating class Notice as set forth in this 23 Settlement Agreement and ordered by the Court was accomplished as directed, constituted the 24 best practicable notice under the circumstances, met or exceeded the requirements of due 25 process, and constituted due and sufficient notice to all members of the Settlement Class; 26 6. The Parties shall effectuate the terms of the Settlement Agreement; [PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL - 2 CASE NO. C09-05418 RS 1 7. Toyota, as defined in the Settlement Agreement, is hereby released and 2 otherwise discharged from all further liability for the Released Claims to Settlement Class 3 members; 4 8. Each of the Settlement Class members and any of their predecessors, successors, 5 representatives, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, heirs, executors, administrators, 6 attorneys, successors, and assignees, are permanently barred from instituting, filing, 7 commencing, prosecuting, maintaining, continuing to prosecute, directly or indirectly, as an 8 individual or collectively, representatively, derivatively, or on behalf of them, or in any other 9 capacity of any kind whatsoever, any action in any state or federal court or any other tribunal, 10 11 12 13 14 15 forum, or proceeding of any kind, against Toyota that asserts any of the Released Claims; 9. This Litigation is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without costs to any Party, other than as specified in the Settlement Agreement and this Order; 10. This Judgment is the Final Judgment in the suit as to all Class Member Released Claims. 11. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court retains 16 jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of the Settlement and the terms of the Settlement 17 Agreement; (b) distribution of the Class Settlement Amount, the Class Representative Incentive 18 Awards, and the Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Amount; and (c) all other proceedings related to the 19 implementation, interpretation, administration, consummation, and enforcement of the terms of 20 the Settlement Agreement and/or the Settlement, and the administration of Claims by 21 Settlement Class Members. 22 23 12. This Court finds that there is no just reason for delay and expressly directs Judgment and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court. 24 25 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL - 3 CASE NO. C09-05418 RS 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2nd February DATED this ______day of ________________, 2012. 3 4 5 __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 Presented by: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC By: /s/ Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181 Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181 Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com 936 North 34th Street, Suite 400 Seattle, Washington 98103-8869 Telephone: (206) 816-6603 Facsimile: (206) 350-3528 Michael F. Ram, CSB #104805 Jeffrey B. Cereghino, CSB #99480 Email: mram@raocklaw.com RAM OLSON CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 433-4949 Facsimile: (415) 433-7311 Steven M. Tindall, CSB #187862 Email: steventindall@rhdtlaw.com Angela Perone, CSB #245793 Email: angelaperone@rhdtlaw.com RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL 100 Pine Street, Suite 725 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 421-1800 Facsimile: (415) 421-1700 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL - 4 CASE NO. C09-05418 RS 1 2 3 4 5 Jennie L. Anderson, CSB #203586 Email: jennie@andrusanderson.com ANDRUS ANDERSON LLP 155 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 986-1400 Facsimile: (415) 986-1474 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Class 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL - 5 CASE NO. C09-05418 RS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I, Beth E. Terrell, hereby certify that on February 2, 2012, I electronically filed the 3 foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of 4 such filing to the following: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Frank C. Rothrock Email: frothrock@shb.com Douglas W. Robinson Email: dwrobinson@shb.com Eva M. Weiler Email: eweiler@shb.com SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1600 Irvine, California 92614 Telephone: (949) 475-1500 Facsimile: (949) 475-0016 Robert Thomas Adams, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Email: rtadams@shb.com SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP 2555 Grand Boulevard Kansas City, Missouri 64108 Telephone: (816) 474-6550 Facsimile: (816) 421-5547 Attorneys for Defendants DATED this 2nd day of February, 2012. TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC 24 By: /s/ Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181 Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181 Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com 936 North 34th Street, Suite 400 Seattle, Washington 98103-8869 Telephone: (206) 816-6603 Facsimile: (206) 350-3528 25 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 21 22 23 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL - 6 CASE NO. C09-05418 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?