Milligan et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
Filing
82
ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/2/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181
Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com
TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC
936 North 34th Street, Suite 400
Seattle, Washington 98103-8869
Telephone: (206) 816-6603
Facsimile: (206) 350-3528
Jeffrey B. Cereghino, CSB #099480
Email: jcereghino@merrillnomura.com
MERRILL, NOMURA & MOLINEUX LLP
350 Rose Street
Danville, California 94526
Telephone: (925) 833-1000
Facsimile: (925) 833-1001
10
[Additional counsel appear on signature page]
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Class
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
CARIN and GEORGE EDWIN MILLIGAN,
California residents, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
19
20
NO. C09-05418 RS
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL
JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL
v.
(Clerk’s Action Required)
21
22
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a
California corporation and TOYOTA
MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation,
23
Defendant.
24
25
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND
DISMISSAL - 1
CASE NO. C09-05418 RS
CLASS ACTION
1
WHEREAS, on January 6, 2012, the Court entered an Order Granting Final Approval of
2
Class Action Settlement and Granting Award of Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Incentive
3
Payments to Class Representatives (Dkt. 80), which Order is incorporated herein by reference;
4
WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement requires that the Court enter certain findings;
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS:
6
1.
7
8
9
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action, all members of
the Settlement Class and Defendant;
2.
The proposed Class meets Rule 23’s requirements and certification is
appropriate for settlement purposes only. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a)
10
and 23(b)(3), the Court has certified, for settlement purposes only, the following class:
11
All persons in the United States, including the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, who currently own or lease or who previously owned
or leased a model-year 2001-2003 Toyota RAV4 vehicle with
automatic transmissions (“Class Vehicle”). Excluded from the
Settlement Class are the following: a) officers and directors of
Toyota (as defined below) b) the Judge to whom this case is
assigned and any member of the Judge’s immediate family; and c)
persons who have submitted a timely and valid request for
exclusion from the Settlement Class;
12
13
14
15
16
17
3.
The Named Plaintiffs and Class Counsel have fairly and adequately represented
18
the interests of the Settlement Class Members at all times in this case and in the related action
19
of Washington v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc.;
20
21
22
4.
The proposed Class Settlement is the result of arm’s length negotiations and is
fair, reasonable, and adequate;
5.
The form and manner of disseminating class Notice as set forth in this
23
Settlement Agreement and ordered by the Court was accomplished as directed, constituted the
24
best practicable notice under the circumstances, met or exceeded the requirements of due
25
process, and constituted due and sufficient notice to all members of the Settlement Class;
26
6.
The Parties shall effectuate the terms of the Settlement Agreement;
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND
DISMISSAL - 2
CASE NO. C09-05418 RS
1
7.
Toyota, as defined in the Settlement Agreement, is hereby released and
2
otherwise discharged from all further liability for the Released Claims to Settlement Class
3
members;
4
8.
Each of the Settlement Class members and any of their predecessors, successors,
5
representatives, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, heirs, executors, administrators,
6
attorneys, successors, and assignees, are permanently barred from instituting, filing,
7
commencing, prosecuting, maintaining, continuing to prosecute, directly or indirectly, as an
8
individual or collectively, representatively, derivatively, or on behalf of them, or in any other
9
capacity of any kind whatsoever, any action in any state or federal court or any other tribunal,
10
11
12
13
14
15
forum, or proceeding of any kind, against Toyota that asserts any of the Released Claims;
9.
This Litigation is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without costs to any
Party, other than as specified in the Settlement Agreement and this Order;
10.
This Judgment is the Final Judgment in the suit as to all Class Member Released
Claims.
11.
Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court retains
16
jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of the Settlement and the terms of the Settlement
17
Agreement; (b) distribution of the Class Settlement Amount, the Class Representative Incentive
18
Awards, and the Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Amount; and (c) all other proceedings related to the
19
implementation, interpretation, administration, consummation, and enforcement of the terms of
20
the Settlement Agreement and/or the Settlement, and the administration of Claims by
21
Settlement Class Members.
22
23
12.
This Court finds that there is no just reason for delay and expressly directs
Judgment and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court.
24
25
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND
DISMISSAL - 3
CASE NO. C09-05418 RS
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2nd
February
DATED this ______day of ________________, 2012.
3
4
5
__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
Presented by:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC
By: /s/ Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181
Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181
Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com
936 North 34th Street, Suite 400
Seattle, Washington 98103-8869
Telephone: (206) 816-6603
Facsimile: (206) 350-3528
Michael F. Ram, CSB #104805
Jeffrey B. Cereghino, CSB #99480
Email: mram@raocklaw.com
RAM OLSON CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI LLP
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 433-4949
Facsimile: (415) 433-7311
Steven M. Tindall, CSB #187862
Email: steventindall@rhdtlaw.com
Angela Perone, CSB #245793
Email: angelaperone@rhdtlaw.com
RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL
100 Pine Street, Suite 725
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 421-1800
Facsimile: (415) 421-1700
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND
DISMISSAL - 4
CASE NO. C09-05418 RS
1
2
3
4
5
Jennie L. Anderson, CSB #203586
Email: jennie@andrusanderson.com
ANDRUS ANDERSON LLP
155 Montgomery Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 986-1400
Facsimile: (415) 986-1474
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Class
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND
DISMISSAL - 5
CASE NO. C09-05418 RS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I, Beth E. Terrell, hereby certify that on February 2, 2012, I electronically filed the
3
foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of
4
such filing to the following:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Frank C. Rothrock
Email: frothrock@shb.com
Douglas W. Robinson
Email: dwrobinson@shb.com
Eva M. Weiler
Email: eweiler@shb.com
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP
5 Park Plaza, Suite 1600
Irvine, California 92614
Telephone: (949) 475-1500
Facsimile: (949) 475-0016
Robert Thomas Adams, Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Email: rtadams@shb.com
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP
2555 Grand Boulevard
Kansas City, Missouri 64108
Telephone: (816) 474-6550
Facsimile: (816) 421-5547
Attorneys for Defendants
DATED this 2nd day of February, 2012.
TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC
24
By: /s/ Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181
Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181
Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com
936 North 34th Street, Suite 400
Seattle, Washington 98103-8869
Telephone: (206) 816-6603
Facsimile: (206) 350-3528
25
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21
22
23
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND
DISMISSAL - 6
CASE NO. C09-05418 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?