Balthaser Online, Inc. v. Art Star Design LLC et al

Filing 486

STIPULATION AND ORDER ON DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT NING, INC. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/3/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2010)

Download PDF
Balthaser Online, Inc. v. Art Star Design LLC et al Doc. 486 *E-Filed 9/3/10* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP Alfred R Fabricant (admitted pro hac vice) fabricanta@dicksteinshapiro.com Lawrence C. Drucker (admitted pro hac vice) druckerl@dicksteinshapiro.com Cindy Yang (admitted pro hac vice) yangc@dicksteinshapiro.com Bryan N. DeMatteo (admitted pro hac vice) dematteob@dicksteinshapiro.com 1633 Broadway New York, NY 10019-6708 Telephone: (212) 277-6500 Fax: (212) 277-6501 and Lawrence R. LaPorte (SBN 130003) laporte@dicksteinshapiro.com 2049 Century Park East, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Attorneys for Plaintiff BALTHASER ONLINE, INC. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Wayne M. Barsky (SBN 116731) wbarsky@gibsondunn.com 2029 Century Park East Los Angeles, CA 90067-3026 Telephone: (310) 557-8183 Facsimile: (310) 552-7010 and Sarah E. Piepmeier (SBN 227094) spiepmeier@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 393-8200 Facsimile: (415) 374-8404 Attorneys for Defendant NING, INC. [Proposed] Order re Stipulation on Dismissal of Defendant Ning, Inc. No. 3:09-cv-05422-RS Dockets.Justia.com 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION BALTHASER ONLINE, INC., Plaintiff, v. ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC, et al. Defendants. No. 3:09-cv-05422-RS [PROPOSED] ORDER RE. STIPULATION ON DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT NING, INC. WHEREAS, (1) on November, 4, 2008, Plaintiff Balthaser Online, Inc. ("Balthaser") filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, commencing Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-430 (DF) against, among others, Defendant Ning, Inc. ("Ning"); (2) on January 12, 2009, Ning filed an Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint; (3) on January 15, 2009, Balthaser filed a First Amended Complaint; (4) on February 2, 2009, Ning filed an Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint; (5) on September 15, 2009, an Order concerning California Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue was issued transferring the action with respect to California Defendants, and certain other defendants, including Ning, to this District; (6) on November 17, 2009, the E.D. Texas Action was transferred to this District and assigned to the Honorable Patricia V. Trumbell; (7) on December 15, 2009, the above-styled action was reassigned to Honorable Jeremy Fogel; and (8) on March 18, 2010, the above-styled action was reassigned to this Court. WHEREAS, Balthaser and Ning have reached a mutually satisfactory resolution of all issues between them that were the subject of Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-430 (DF) and the abovestyled action (collectively, the "Action"); 2 [Proposed] Order re Stipulation on Dismissal of Defendant Ning, Inc. No. 3:09-cv-05422-RS 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP WHEREAS, Balthaser and Ning have filed a Stipulation of Dismissal (the "Stipulation") with this Court advising the Court that the parties have reached a mutually satisfactory resolution of all issues between them that were subject of this Action; NOW, THEREFORE, after considering the Stipulation, the Court is of the opinion that the Stipulation should be granted and therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1. All claims and counterclaims asserted by either party in the Action against the other are hereby dismissed with prejudice; 2. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees associated with the prosecution and defense of this Action; and 3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of enforcement of the settlement. 9/3/10 Dated: __________________ ____________________________ Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge 3 [Proposed] Order re Stipulation on Dismissal of Defendant Ning, Inc. No. 3:09-cv-05422-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?