Bank of New York v. Lopez

Filing 7

ORDER VACATING HEARING RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (mejlc1, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California THE BANK OF NEW YORK v. MARIO LOPEZ Defendant(s). _____________________________________/ Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to remand, filed on December 8, 2009. (Dkt. #5.) However, Plaintiff noticed the motion for a hearing on January 7, 2010. Plaintiff's noticed hearing date does not comply with Civil Local Rule 7. Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the January 7 hearing. Plaintiff shall re-notice its motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7. IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff(s), No. C 09-05432 MEJ ORDER VACATING HEARING RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 9, 2009 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. MARIO LOPEZ et al, Defendant. / Case Number: CV09-05432 MEJ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on December 9, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Dated: December 9, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk Mario Lopez 17361 Lake View Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?