Pagtakhan v. Foulk
Filing
43
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
MARLON E. PAGTAKHAN,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
No. C 09-5495 SI (pr)
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
ED FOULK,
Respondent.
13
/
14
15
Petitioner’s request for a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED because he has not
16
demonstrated that “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid
17
claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable
18
whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.
19
473, 484 (2000).
20
21
The Clerk shall forward to the court of appeals the case file with this Order. See United
States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997).
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
DATED: October 18, 2011
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
26
27
28
G:\SI\HABEAS\2009\09-5495\09-5495.08.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?