Northern California River Watch v. Golden Technology Company et al

Filing 28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING Show Cause Response due by 5/4/2010.. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 30, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 30, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. v. GOLDEN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, ARNOLD CARSTON, LARRY CARRILLO, FRANCINE CLAYTON, and DOES 130, inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. / / NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, No. C 09-05496 WHA ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a first amended complaint was noticed for May 20, 2010.* Under the normal 35-day track, defendants' opposition should have been filed on or before April 29, 2010. It is now Friday, April 30, and no opposition has been filed. Defendants are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by NOON ON TUESDAY, MAY 4, 2010, why plaintiff's motion should not be treated as unopposed and granted. Since this failure throws off the briefing schedule, the hearing on this motion is VACATED. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE * While plaintiff simultaneously filed a motion to shorten time, it was denied.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?