Datel Holdings Ltd. et al v. Microsoft Corporation
Filing
285
ORDER GRANTING re 282 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief Amici Curiae In Support of Datel's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Electronic Frontier Foundation. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 08/01/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Corynne McSherry (CA SBN 221504)
corynne@eff.org
Abigail Phillips (CA SBN 225562)
abigail@eff.org
Marcia Hofmann (CA SBN 250087)
marcia@eff.org
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: (415) 436-9333
Facsimile: (415) 436-9993
8
9
10
11
12
13
Jason M. Schultz (CA SBN 212600)
jschultz@law.berkeley.edu
SAMUELSON LAW, TECHNOLOGY &
PUBLIC POLICY CLINIC
U.C. Berkeley School of Law
396 Simon Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
Telephone: (510) 642-0499
Facsimile: (510) 643-4625
Sherwin Siy (DC SBN 501024)
ssiy@publicknowledge.org
PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE
1818 N Street, NW, Suite 410
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: (202) 861-0020
Facsimile: (202) 861-0040
14
15
16
17
18
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER
FOUNDATION
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae
PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATEL HOLDINGS LTD. And DATEL )
)
DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 09-cv-5535 EDL
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
AND PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AMICI
CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF DATEL’S
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
THEREON
Courtroom: E, 15th Floor
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AMICI CURIAE
CASE NO. 09-cv-5535 EDL
1
2
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
3
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned proposed Amici Curiae will and hereby do
4
move the Court for leave to file the accompanying proposed Reply Brief Amici Curiae In Support of
5
Datel’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs consent to the filing of this brief. Defendant
6
does not.
7
I.
8
As explained in Amici’s motion for leave to file their principal brief, the Electronic Frontier
9
Foundation (EFF) is a non-profit, member-supported civil liberties organization working to protect
10
rights in the digital world. As part of its mission, EFF has served as counsel or amicus in key cases
11
addressing user rights to free speech, privacy, and innovation as applied to the Internet and other new
12
technologies. Public Knowledge is a non-profit public interest 501(c)(3) corporation, working to
13
defend citizens’ rights in the emerging digital culture. Its primary mission is to promote innovation,
14
protect the legal rights of all users of copyrighted works, and ensure that copyright law remains
15
balanced and does not slow technology innovation, unduly burden free speech, shrink the public
16
domain, or prevent fair use.
Statement of Interest of Amici Curiae
17
II.
18
EFF and Public Knowledge file this brief in order to assist the Court in its consideration of the
19
proper scope of Section 1201(a) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”), and the
20
common law doctrines of misuse and exhaustion. Defendant Microsoft and its amicus ESA submitted
21
briefing in response to EFF and PK’s principal brief that misconstrues the arguments and misstates the
22
holding of the key controlling case in this circuit on Section 1201 liability, MDY Industries v. Blizzard
23
Entertainment, 629 F.3d 928 (9th Cir. 2010) (“MDY”). See Def. Resp. to EFF Am. Br.; ESA Am. Br.
24
EFF and PK seek leave to file a short reply brief in order to correct these misstatements and explain
25
how EFF and PK’s approach is consistent with the text and structure of 17 U.S.C. § 1201 as well as
26
long-standing common law precedents.
Issues Addressed by Movants in the Brief
27
These issues are particularly pressing because an erroneous interpretation of MDY and its
28
teachings could lead to subsequent decisions that may significantly limit consumers’ ability to make
1
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AMICI CURIAE
CASE NO. 09-cv-5535 EDL
1
2
reasonable uses of products they lawfully purchase. Thus, Amici believe this brief will assist the
3
Court’s deliberations regarding the important legal issues raised in this case.
4
CONCLUSION
5
For the above reasons, EFF and Public Knowledge respectfully request this Court’s leave to
6
submit the accompanying brief.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Dated: July 29, 2011
By:
/s/ Corynne McSherry
Corynne McSherry, Esq.
Abigail Phillips, Esq.
Marcia Hofmann, Esq.
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER
FOUNDATION
Jason M. Schultz, Esq.
SAMUELSON LAW, TECHNOLOGY &
PUBLIC POLICY CLINIC
14
15
16
17
18
19
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER
FOUNDATION
Sherwin Siy, Esq.
PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae
PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AMICI CURIAE
CASE NO. 09-cv-5535 EDL
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
4
Good cause appearing, the motion of the EFF and Public Knowledge for leave to file a brief of
amici curiae is hereby GRANTED.
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
August 1, 2011
Dated: ________________________
______________________________
Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF OF
AMICI CURIAE
CASE NO. 09-cv-5535 EDL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?