Datel Holdings Ltd. et al v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 285

ORDER GRANTING re 282 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief Amici Curiae In Support of Datel's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Electronic Frontier Foundation. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 08/01/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Corynne McSherry (CA SBN 221504) corynne@eff.org Abigail Phillips (CA SBN 225562) abigail@eff.org Marcia Hofmann (CA SBN 250087) marcia@eff.org ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 8 9 10 11 12 13 Jason M. Schultz (CA SBN 212600) jschultz@law.berkeley.edu SAMUELSON LAW, TECHNOLOGY & PUBLIC POLICY CLINIC U.C. Berkeley School of Law 396 Simon Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-7200 Telephone: (510) 642-0499 Facsimile: (510) 643-4625 Sherwin Siy (DC SBN 501024) ssiy@publicknowledge.org PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE 1818 N Street, NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: (202) 861-0020 Facsimile: (202) 861-0040 14 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Amicus Curiae ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION Attorneys for Amicus Curiae PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATEL HOLDINGS LTD. And DATEL ) ) DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 09-cv-5535 EDL ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION AND PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF DATEL’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Courtroom: E, 15th Floor Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AMICI CURIAE CASE NO. 09-cv-5535 EDL 1 2 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned proposed Amici Curiae will and hereby do 4 move the Court for leave to file the accompanying proposed Reply Brief Amici Curiae In Support of 5 Datel’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs consent to the filing of this brief. Defendant 6 does not. 7 I. 8 As explained in Amici’s motion for leave to file their principal brief, the Electronic Frontier 9 Foundation (EFF) is a non-profit, member-supported civil liberties organization working to protect 10 rights in the digital world. As part of its mission, EFF has served as counsel or amicus in key cases 11 addressing user rights to free speech, privacy, and innovation as applied to the Internet and other new 12 technologies. Public Knowledge is a non-profit public interest 501(c)(3) corporation, working to 13 defend citizens’ rights in the emerging digital culture. Its primary mission is to promote innovation, 14 protect the legal rights of all users of copyrighted works, and ensure that copyright law remains 15 balanced and does not slow technology innovation, unduly burden free speech, shrink the public 16 domain, or prevent fair use. Statement of Interest of Amici Curiae 17 II. 18 EFF and Public Knowledge file this brief in order to assist the Court in its consideration of the 19 proper scope of Section 1201(a) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”), and the 20 common law doctrines of misuse and exhaustion. Defendant Microsoft and its amicus ESA submitted 21 briefing in response to EFF and PK’s principal brief that misconstrues the arguments and misstates the 22 holding of the key controlling case in this circuit on Section 1201 liability, MDY Industries v. Blizzard 23 Entertainment, 629 F.3d 928 (9th Cir. 2010) (“MDY”). See Def. Resp. to EFF Am. Br.; ESA Am. Br. 24 EFF and PK seek leave to file a short reply brief in order to correct these misstatements and explain 25 how EFF and PK’s approach is consistent with the text and structure of 17 U.S.C. § 1201 as well as 26 long-standing common law precedents. Issues Addressed by Movants in the Brief 27 These issues are particularly pressing because an erroneous interpretation of MDY and its 28 teachings could lead to subsequent decisions that may significantly limit consumers’ ability to make 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AMICI CURIAE CASE NO. 09-cv-5535 EDL 1 2 reasonable uses of products they lawfully purchase. Thus, Amici believe this brief will assist the 3 Court’s deliberations regarding the important legal issues raised in this case. 4 CONCLUSION 5 For the above reasons, EFF and Public Knowledge respectfully request this Court’s leave to 6 submit the accompanying brief. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: July 29, 2011 By: /s/ Corynne McSherry Corynne McSherry, Esq. Abigail Phillips, Esq. Marcia Hofmann, Esq. ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION Jason M. Schultz, Esq. SAMUELSON LAW, TECHNOLOGY & PUBLIC POLICY CLINIC 14 15 16 17 18 19 Attorneys for Amicus Curiae ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION Sherwin Siy, Esq. PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE Attorneys for Amicus Curiae PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AMICI CURIAE CASE NO. 09-cv-5535 EDL 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 4 Good cause appearing, the motion of the EFF and Public Knowledge for leave to file a brief of amici curiae is hereby GRANTED. 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. August 1, 2011 Dated: ________________________ ______________________________ Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE CASE NO. 09-cv-5535 EDL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?