Datel Holdings Ltd. et al v. Microsoft Corporation
Filing
390
ORDER RE SECOND STIPULATED AMENDMENT TO CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL: Expert Witness Discovery due by 11/11/2011. Third Round of Motion for Summary Judgment to be filed by 11/15/2011. Responses due by 12/9/2011. Replies due by 12/23/2011. Third Motion for Summary Judgment set for 1/18/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 11/2/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DATEL HOLDINGS LTD,
Plaintiff,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
ORDER REGARDING SECOND
STIPULATED AMENDMENT TO CASE
MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL
ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL
v.
10
11
No. C -09-05535 EDL
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
Defendant.
12
/
13
On October 26, 2011, the parties filed a stipulated amendment to the Case Management and
14
15
Pretrial Order for Jury Trial. Pursuant to that stipulation, the Court issues the following Order:
16
1.
thereto, and on damages, shall be completed no later than November 11, 2011.
17
18
All technical expert discovery on the newly-asserted claims and defenses and defenses
2.
The third round of dispositive motions shall be served and filed no later than November 15,
19
2011. Any oppositions to these motions shall be served and filed no later than 2:00 p.m. on
20
December 9, 2011. Any replies to the oppositions shall be served and filed no later than
21
December 23, 2011.
22
3.
18, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.
23
24
The hearing date for the third round of summary judgment motions is Wednesday, January
4.
Prior to filing dispositive motions for the third round, the parties shall meet and confer to
25
discuss the topics raised by the motions. If the parties intend to bring motions on related
26
topics, they shall coordinate those motions so that there are only four briefs, rather than six.
27
(For example, if both parties intend to seek summary judgment on claims that are related, the
28
briefing shall be: one motion, one opposition/cross-motion, one reply/opposition, and one
reply. The parties shall meet and confer and propose to the Court a separate briefing
1
schedule if any such motions are contemplated.). No later than November 8, 2011, the
2
parties shall inform the Court of the topics raised by the motions and the reason why
3
deciding those motions at that time constitutes sound case management so as to facilitate the
4
just, speedy and inexpensive resolution of this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. The Court may
5
require additional justification from the parties for bringing certain dispositive motions.
6
5.
In all other respects, the Amendment To Case Management And Pretrial Order For Jury
7
Trial, entered on June 6, 2011, and the Stipulated Amendment To Case Management And
8
Pretrial Order For Jury Trial, entered July 29, 2011, remain in effect.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
Dated: November 2, 2011
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?