Datel Holdings Ltd. et al v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 390

ORDER RE SECOND STIPULATED AMENDMENT TO CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL: Expert Witness Discovery due by 11/11/2011. Third Round of Motion for Summary Judgment to be filed by 11/15/2011. Responses due by 12/9/2011. Replies due by 12/23/2011. Third Motion for Summary Judgment set for 1/18/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 11/2/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DATEL HOLDINGS LTD, Plaintiff, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California ORDER REGARDING SECOND STIPULATED AMENDMENT TO CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL v. 10 11 No. C -09-05535 EDL MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. 12 / 13 On October 26, 2011, the parties filed a stipulated amendment to the Case Management and 14 15 Pretrial Order for Jury Trial. Pursuant to that stipulation, the Court issues the following Order: 16 1. thereto, and on damages, shall be completed no later than November 11, 2011. 17 18 All technical expert discovery on the newly-asserted claims and defenses and defenses 2. The third round of dispositive motions shall be served and filed no later than November 15, 19 2011. Any oppositions to these motions shall be served and filed no later than 2:00 p.m. on 20 December 9, 2011. Any replies to the oppositions shall be served and filed no later than 21 December 23, 2011. 22 3. 18, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. 23 24 The hearing date for the third round of summary judgment motions is Wednesday, January 4. Prior to filing dispositive motions for the third round, the parties shall meet and confer to 25 discuss the topics raised by the motions. If the parties intend to bring motions on related 26 topics, they shall coordinate those motions so that there are only four briefs, rather than six. 27 (For example, if both parties intend to seek summary judgment on claims that are related, the 28 briefing shall be: one motion, one opposition/cross-motion, one reply/opposition, and one reply. The parties shall meet and confer and propose to the Court a separate briefing 1 schedule if any such motions are contemplated.). No later than November 8, 2011, the 2 parties shall inform the Court of the topics raised by the motions and the reason why 3 deciding those motions at that time constitutes sound case management so as to facilitate the 4 just, speedy and inexpensive resolution of this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. The Court may 5 require additional justification from the parties for bringing certain dispositive motions. 6 5. In all other respects, the Amendment To Case Management And Pretrial Order For Jury 7 Trial, entered on June 6, 2011, and the Stipulated Amendment To Case Management And 8 Pretrial Order For Jury Trial, entered July 29, 2011, remain in effect. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 Dated: November 2, 2011 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?