Boddie et al v. Axiant, LLC

Filing 54

ORDER extending time to answer to second amended complaint re 53 Stipulation filed by Accretive, LLC. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/21/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARGARET A. KEANE (SBN 255378) mkeane@dl.com SEBASTIAN L. MILLER (SBN 265793) smiller@dl.com DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP 1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 845-7000 Facsimile: (650) 845-7333 Attorneys for Defendant Accretive, LLC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) KENYA BODDIE AND RAMONDA CARLOS, ) individually and on behalf of others similarly ) situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) AXIANT, LLC; ACCRETIVE, LLC; MANN ) BRACKEN, LLP, and DOES 1 through 25, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) CASE NO.: CV-09-5553 (CRB) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR ACCRETIVE, LLC TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT In consideration of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4) and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), the parties hereby stipulate to an extension of time for Defendant Accretive, LLC ("Accretive") to respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") to and including Monday, June 28, 2010: RECITALS 1. On March 25, 2010, Plaintiffs filed their SAC alleging violations of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (the "WARN Act"). 2. 3. On April 12, 2010, Accretive filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' SAC. On June 4, 2010, the Court denied Accretive's motion to dismiss the SAC. 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. CV-09 5553 (CRB) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(a), Accretive's Answer to Plaintiffs' SAC is due on June 18, 2010. 5. Plaintiffs' Counsel does not oppose the extension of time for Accretive to file its Answer to Plaintiffs' SAC. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, that Accretive shall have an extension of ten days, to and including Monday, June 28, 2010, to respond or answer Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. Dated: June 17, 2010 DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP By: /s/ Sebastian L. Miller Margaret A. Keane (SBN 255378) mkeane@dl.com Sebastian L. Miller (SBN 265793) smiller@dl.com 1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Tel: (650) 845-7000 Fax: (650) 845-7333 Attorneys for Defendant Accretive, LLC Dated: June 17, 2010 HERRON & HERRON By: /s/ Laura Herron Weber J. Wynne Herron (SBN 71192) Laura Herron Weber (SBN 226934) laura@herron-herron.com 18360 Sonoma Highway Sonoma, CA 95476 Tel: (707) 933-4430 Fax: (707) 933-4431 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Kenya Boddie and Ramonda Carlos ISTRIC ES D TC AT T PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED RT U O S Dated:______________, 2010 June 21 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ER N CASE NO. CV-09 C (CRB) F D I S T I C T O 5553 R A LI 2 FO Judge C . Breyer harles R R NIA HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER NO OO IT IS S RDERE D RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?