Jimenez v. Bank of America et al

Filing 44

ORDER DENYING (1) REQUEST FOR FEES AND (2) MOTION TO STRIKE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/20/2011. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 GABRIEL JIMENEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. C 09-05575 CRB ORDER DENYING (1) REQUEST FOR FEES AND (2) MOTION TO STRIKE v. BANK OF AMERICA FKA, 15 Defendant. / 16 In this mortgage case, Defendant has asked the Court to order Plaintiff to award 17 18 Defendant its legal fees under Rule 11, arguing that Plaintiff’s Complaint lacks evidentiary 19 support, is not warranted by the existing law, and was filed for an improper purpose. 20 See dkt. 29. In turn, Plaintiff asks the Court to strike the Supplemental Declaration of James 21 Goldberg filed in connection with Defendant’s filing, arguing that “enough is enough, 22 already.” See dkt. 42 at 1. The Court has carefully considered the parties’ arguments and 23 hereby DENIES both requests. Although the Court is very much concerned with counsel 24 Sharon Lapin’s conduct in this case, it is not prepared to conclude that she brought this suit 25 with an improper motive, as Defendant asserts. Nor does the Court find that the 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 2 Supplemental Declaration was improper or unfairly prejudicial. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: June 20, 2011 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\CRBALL\2009\5575\order re lapin.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?