Nokia Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 133

ORDER of dismissal (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012)

4491
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Randall Allen (State Bar No. 264067)
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
Two Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400
Palo Alto, California 94306
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-838-2001
Email: [e-mail]
Peter Kontio ([e-mail])
Valarie C. Williams ([e-mail])
B. Parker Miller ([e-mail])
Joann E. Johnston ([e-mail])
Lisa K. Bojko ([e-mail])
Donald M. Houser ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404-881-7777

15

Richard W. Stimson ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
Chase Tower, Suite 3601
2200 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 214-922-3899

16

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.

12
13
14

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19
20
21
22
23

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: Case No. 3:09-CV5609
NOKIA CORPORATION and
NOKIA INC.,

24
25

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO: 3:09-CV-5609
MDL FILE NO: 3:07-MD-1827-SII
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
AND PROPOSED ORDER

v.

26
27
28

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.
Defendants.
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827-SII
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609

1

Plaintiff Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc. (“Nokia”), and Defendants Seiko Epson

2

Corporation; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

3

(“Epson”), by their respective attorneys and under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil

4

Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of the present action with prejudice and state as follows:

5

1. Nokia and Epson seek the dismissal of this action with prejudice.

6

2. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Nokia against any other defendant or

7

co-conspirator in this litigation.

8

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court issue an Agreed Order of

9

Dismissal.

10

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11

Date: January 6, 2012.

12
By:

//s// B. Parker Miller
_
Randall Allen (State Bar No. 264067)
B. Parker Miller
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404-881-7777
Counsel for Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corporation

By:

13

//s// Stephen P. Freccero
_
Melvin R. Goldman (CA SB No. 34097)
Stephen P. Freccero (CA SB No. 131093)
Derek F. Foran (CA SB No. 224569)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Defendants Seiko Epson
Corporation; Epson Imaging Devices
Corporation; and Epson Electronics America,
Inc.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

2

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827-SII
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609

1
2
3

Randall Allen (State Bar No. 264067)
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-838-2001
Email: [e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9

Peter Kontio ([e-mail])
Valarie C. Williams ([e-mail])
B. Parker Miller ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404-881-7777

12

Richard W. Stimson ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
Chase Tower, Suite 3601
2200 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 214-922-3899

13

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18
19

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: All Cases
NOKIA CORPORATION and
NOKIA INC.,

20
21
22

CASE NO: 3:09-CV-5609
MDL FILE NO: 3:07-MD-1827-SI

Plaintiffs,

PROPOSED ORDER

v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION et al.

23

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:
1. Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.’s action is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants
PROPOSED ORDER

1

MASTER FILE NO. 07-MD-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609

1

Seiko Epson Corporation; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

2

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2).

3

2. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

6th
This ____ day of January, 2012.

6
7
8

1/6/12
Dated: _________________

_____________________________________
Hon. Susan Y. Illston
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED ORDER

2

MASTER FILE NO. 07-MD-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609