Nokia Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 134

ORDER DISMISSING CASE (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2012)

1
2
3

Randall Allen (State Bar No. 264067)
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-838-2001
Email: [e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9

Peter Kontio ([e-mail])
Valarie C. Williams ([e-mail])
B. Parker Miller ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404-881-7777

12

Richard W. Stimson ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
Chase Tower, Suite 3601
2200 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 214-922-3899

13

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18
19

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: All Cases
NOKIA CORPORATION and
NOKIA INC.,

20
21
22

CASE NO: 3:09-CV-5609
MDL FILE NO: 3:07-MD-1827-SI

Plaintiffs,

PROPOSED ORDER

v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION et al.

23

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:
1. Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.’s action is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants
PROPOSED ORDER

1

MASTER FILE NO. 07-MD-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609

1

Seiko Epson Corporation; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

2

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2).

3

2. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

This ____ day of January, 2012.
9th

6
7
8

Dated: _________________

_____________________________________
Hon. Susan Y. Illston
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED ORDER

2

MASTER FILE NO. 07-MD-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609