Nokia Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 138

ORDER MODIFYING DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTIONS TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge ILLSTON on 1/19/12. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

KENT M. ROGER, CA Bar No. 95987
HERMAN J. HOYING, CA Bar No. 257495
MINNA L. NARANJO, CA Bar No. 259005
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.442.1001
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.,
HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.

9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827

This Document Relates To:

14

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER MODIFYING DEADLINE
FOR FILING OF MOTION TO
COMPEL

15
16
Case No. 09-cv-5609 SI
17
18

NOKIA CORPORATION and
NOKIA, INC.,

19

Plaintiffs,
v.

20
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.
21
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
500963558v1

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTS. TO COMPEL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1

Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia, Inc. (collectively, “Nokia”) and Defendants

2

Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi Displays, Ltd. (collectively, the “Hitachi Defendants”) hereby

3

stipulate as follows:
STIPULATION

4

WHEREAS discovery closed in this case on December 8, 2011, as set forth in the

5
6

Stipulation and Order Modifying Pretrial Schedule for “Track One” Direct Action Plaintiff

7

and State Attorney General Actions (Dkt. No. 3110, the “Scheduling Order”);
WHEREAS Nokia served its First Set of Requests for Admission (“Requests”) to

8
9

the Hitachi Defendants on November 8, 2011;
WHEREAS the Court has entered an Order extending the close of fact discovery set

10
11

forth in the Scheduling Order for the limited purpose of allowing the Hitachi Defendants

12

respond to Nokia’s First Set of Requests for Admission to December 23, 2011 (Dkt. No.

13

4357);

14
15
16

WHEREAS the Hitachi Defendants served responses to Nokia’s First Set of
Requests for Admission on December 23, 2011.
WHEREAS, the Court has entered an Order extending the time for the filing of

17

motions to compel as to Nokia’s and defendants’ remaining discovery responses to January

18

13, 2012 (Dkt. 4387);

19

WHEREAS, Nokia and the Hitachi defendants are continuing to meet and confer

20

regarding Hitachi Defendants’ response to Nokia’s First Set of Requests for Admission.

21

WHEREAS, Nokia and the Hitachi defendants hope to resolve these issues

22

informally, without the need to file a motion to compel and seek the Court’s involvement;

23

WHEREAS in an effort to facilitate the informal resolution of these issues, Nokia

24

and the Hitachi Defendants wish to extend the deadline to file any motion to compel with

25

respect to the Hitachi Defendants’ response to Nokia’s First Set of Requests for Admission

26

through February 1, 2012.

27
28

NOW, THEREFORE, Nokia and the Hitachi defendants, through their undersigned
respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
500963558v1

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTS. TO COMPEL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1

The deadline for Nokia to file any motion to compel with respect to the Hitachi

2

Defendants’ responses to Nokia’s First Set of Requests for Admission is extended through

3

and including February 1, 2012.

4
5

DATED: January 13, 2012.

6
7
8
9
10
11

_____/s/ Kent M. Roger__________________
Kent M. Roger (CA Bar No. 95987)
Herman J. Hoying (CA Bar No. 257495)
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays,
Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

12

_____/s/ Valarie C. Williams______________
Valarie C. Williams (admitted pro hac vice)
Donald M. Houser (admitted pro hac vice)
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA 30309
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)

13
14
15
16
17

Counsel for Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.

18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

Dated Entered:

1/18/12
The Honorable Susan Illston
District Court Judge

23
24
25

ATTESTATION: Pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

26
27
28
500963558v1

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTS. TO COMPEL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827