Nokia Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 199

ORDER RESETTING ORAL ARGUMENT ON MOTIONS filed by Nokia ( 5879 )(5878) 6092 96157) to 8/31/12.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 8/6/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2012)

1
2
3
4

Randall Allen (State Bar No. 264067)
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-838-2001
Email: [e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Peter Kontio ([e-mail])
Valarie C. Williams ([e-mail])
B. Parker Miller ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404-881-7777
Richard W. Stimson ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
2828 North Harwood Street, 18th Floor
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 214-922-3899

14
15

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL FILE NO: 3:07-md-1827-SI
CASE NO: 3:09-CV-5609-SI

This Document Relates to:

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER RESETTING ORAL
ARGUMENT

NOKIA CORPORATION and NOKIA INC.,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION et al,
CASE NO: 3:09-CV-5609-SI

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609

1

Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia, Inc. (collectively, “Nokia”) and Defendants

2

Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics

3

Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America

4

Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Samsung

5

Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,

6

Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Display Co., Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

7

(collectively, the “Defendants”) (Nokia and Defendants are referred to collectively as the

8

“Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows:
STIPULATION

9
10

WHEREAS Defendants have filed against Nokia a Joint Motion for Partial Summary

11

Judgment as to Claims Based on Foreign Commerce (the “FTAIA Motion”) [MDL Dkt. Nos.

12

5879 (redacted), 5878 (sealed)];

13

WHEREAS Defendants have filed against Nokia a Joint Motion for Partial Summary

14

Judgment as to (1) Claims Based on Inferred Invoices; and (2) State Law Claims (the “Inferred

15

Invoice Motion”) [MDL Dkt. Nos. 6092 (redacted), 6157 (sealed)];

16
17

WHEREAS Oral arguments on the FTAIA Motion are set for August 10, 2012, and oral
arguments on the Inferred Invoice Motion are set for August 31, 2012;

18

WHEREAS the Parties agree that it would be more efficient to reset oral arguments on

19

the FTAIA Motion to the same date set for oral arguments on the Inferred Invoice Motion,

20

specifically, August 31, 2012 at 9:00am.

21
22
23
24

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their undersigned respective counsel,
stipulate and agree as follows:
Oral arguments on the FTAIA Motion shall reset to August 31, 2012 at 9:00am.
DATED: August 6, 2012.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

/s/ Michael Scarborough
Gary L. Halling
James L. McGinnis
Michael W. Scarborough
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
2

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609

1
Counsel for Samsung SDI America, Inc., and Samsung
SDI Co., Ltd.

2
3

Also filed on behalf of Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba
Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Electronic
Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information
Systems, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.,
Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. and Hitachi
Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

4
5
6
7
8

13

/s/ B. Parker Miller
Peter Kontio ([e-mail])
Valarie C. Williams ([e-mail])
B. Parker Miller ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404-881-7777

14

Counsel for Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.

15

ATTESTATION: Pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that

16

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

9
10
11
12

17
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August __, 2012.
6

20
21

______________________________________
Hon. Susan Illston, United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

3

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609