Nokia Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 237

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronics Devices (USA), Inc. terminated.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/20/12. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Randall Allen (State Bar No. 264067)
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
Two Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400
Palo Alto, California 94306
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-838-2001
Email: [e-mail]
Peter Kontio ([e-mail])
Valarie C. Williams ([e-mail])
B. Parker Miller ([e-mail])
Donald M. Houser ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404-881-7777
Richard W. Stimson ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
Chase Tower, Suite 3601
2200 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 214-922-3899
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.

15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17
18

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

19
20
21
22

This Document Relates to: Case No. 3:09-CV5609
NOKIA CORPORATION and
NOKIA INC.,
Plaintiffs,

23
24

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.

26

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
AND PROPOSED ORDER

v.

25

CASE NO: 3:09-CV-5609
MDL FILE NO: 3:07-MD-1827-SI

Defendants.

27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609

1

Plaintiff Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc. (“Nokia”), and Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi

2

Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. (“Hitachi”), by their respective attorneys

3

and under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of

4

the present action with prejudice and state as follows:

5

1. Nokia and Hitachi seek the dismissal of this action against Hitachi with prejudice.

6

2. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Nokia against any other defendant in

7

this litigation.

8

3. Both Nokia and Hitachi are to bear their own costs and fees.

9
10

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court issue an Agreed Order of
Dismissal.

11

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

12

Date: December 19, 2012.

13

By:

s/ B. Parker Miller
_
Randall Allen (State Bar No. 264067)
B. Parker Miller
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404-881-7777
Counsel for Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corporation

By:

s/ Kent M. Roger
_
Kent M. Roger (State Bar No. 95987)
Herman J. Hoying (State Bar No. 257495)
Michelle M. Kim-Szrom (State Bar No. 252901)
MORGAN, LEWIS, & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi
Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices
(USA), Inc.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this

27

document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

2

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609

1
2
3

Randall Allen (State Bar No. 264067)
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-838-2001
Email: [e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9

Peter Kontio ([e-mail])
Valarie C. Williams ([e-mail])
B. Parker Miller ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404-881-7777

12

Richard W. Stimson ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
2828 North Harwood Street
18th Floor
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 214-922-3899

13

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.

10
11

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16
17
18
19

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: All Cases
NOKIA CORPORATION and
NOKIA INC.,

20
21
22

CASE NO: 3:09-CV-5609
MDL FILE NO: 3:07-MD-1827-SI

Plaintiffs,

PROPOSED ORDER

v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION et al.

23

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:
1. Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.’s action is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants
PROPOSED ORDER

1

MASTER FILE NO. 07-MD-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609

1

Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. pursuant to FRCP

2

41(a)(2).

3

2. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

20
This ____ day of December, 2012.

6
7
8

12/20/2012
Dated: _________________

_____________________________________
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED ORDER

2

MASTER FILE NO. 07-MD-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:09-CV-5609