Boon Rawd Trading International Co. Ltd. v. Paleewong Trading Co. Inc.
Filing
124
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR DEADLINE EXTENSION WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 123 Letter filed by Paleewong Trading Co. Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 21, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2010)
Boon Rawd Trading International Co. Ltd. v. Paleewong Trading Co. Inc.
Doc. 124
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. PALEEWONG TRADING CO. INC., Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. / / BOON RAWD TRADING INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD, Plaintiff, No. C 09-05617 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR DEADLINE EXTENSION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
On December 17, 2010, the fact discovery period was extended to January 21, 2011 for the limited purpose of conducting two depositions. On December 21, 2010, Paleewong Trading Co., Inc. filed a letter requesting (1) that the deadline to file dispositive motions be extended from January 5, 2011 to February 11, 2011 and (2) that no dispositive motion be scheduled for hearing prior to February 24, 2010. The letter does not represent that Paleewong conferred with Boon Rawd Trading International Co. to ascertain its position on these requests. Because this letter fails to comport with the requirements of Civil Local Rule 6-2 or 6-3 (as such a requests must do pursuant to Rule 6-1(b)), Paleewong's requests are DENIED. This denial is without prejudice to Paleewong refiling its requests in conformity with the applicable rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 21, 2010.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?