Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 155

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2010)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Doc. 155

1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

John Philip Fry (pro hac vice application pending) Bryan Guy Harrison (pro hac vice application pending) Tim Tingkang Xia (pro hac vice application pending) MORRIS MANNING & MARTIN, LLP 3343 Peachtree Road N.E. Atlanta, GA 30326 Telephone: [phone] Matthew R. Schultz (SBN 220641) TREPEL McGRANE GREENFIELD LLP 150 California Street, Suite 2200 San Francisco CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant MAXCHIP ELECTRONICS CORP. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and RICHTEK USA, INC. Plaintiff(s), vs. uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, SAPPHIRE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, POWERCHIP TECHNOLOGY CORP., MAXCHIP ELECTRONICS CORP., SILICON XTAL CORPORATION, JAMES CHANG, AMANDA DAI, YP HUANG, JACKY LEE, JAY TU, ERIC HUANG, GEORGE CHOU, VINCENT WEN, DOREEN LIU, IVY YANG, STONE HONG, OWEN HSU, KEN WANG, JC CHEN, MARS LIN, WADE CHEN, MING CHEN, XYZ COMPANIES 1-4, AND JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendant(s).

Case No: 09-05659 WHA (PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

Page 1 (Proposed) Order Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice Richtek Technology Corp. vs. uPI Semiconductor Corp., et al. (U.S. N.D. Cal. Case No: 09-05659 WHA)

Dockets.Justia.com

1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Tim Tingkang Xia, whose business address and telephone number is: Tim Tingkang Xia Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP 3343 Peachtree Road, N.E. Atlanta, GA 30326 Telephone [phone] and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of Georgia Supreme Court having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis, representing Maxchip Electronics Corp. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing.

Dated: November 23, 2010 United States District Judge

Page 2 (Proposed) Order Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice Richtek Technology Corp. vs. uPI Semiconductor Corp., et al. (U.S. N.D. Cal. Case No: 09-05659 WHA)