Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 184

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE OPPOSITION UNDER SEAL re 168 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Opposition to Certain Taiwanese Defendants' Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 13, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2010)

Download PDF
Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al Doc. 184 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and RICHTEK USA, INC., Plaintiffs, v. UPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, et al., Defendant. / No. C 09-05659 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE OPPOSITION UNDER SEAL On December 2, 2010, plaintiffs filed an administrative motion to file their opposition to certain Taiwanese defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under seal. Plaintiffs' request was not narrowly tailored in accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and the order approving the stipulated protective order in this action (Dkt. No. 130). Furthermore, defendant uPI Semiconductor Corporation failed to timely file a declaration supporting the motion as required by Rule 79-5. Accordingly, the motion cannot be granted at this time. The parties may cure these defects by NOON ON DECEMBER 16, 2010. No further extensions will be granted. The parties are urged to review and comply with Rule 79-5 regarding all future motions to file under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 13, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?