Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filing
344
ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re 340 Proposed Order filed by Silicon Xtal, uPI Semiconductor Corporation (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
GLENN E. WESTREICH (SBN 100457)
JASON M. GONDER (SBN 257522)
INCHAN A. KWON (SBN 247614)
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
2033 Gateway Place, Suite 300
San Jose, California 95110
Tel: (408) 660-4120
Fax: (408) 660-4121
Email: upi@haynesboone.com
Attorneys for Defendants,
uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
and SILICON XTAL CORPORATION
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
v.
Case No. CV 09-05659 WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR
DEFENDANTS uPI SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION and SILICON XTAL
CORPORATION
uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, et
al.,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
Case No. 09-cv-5659 WHA
1
Having considered the SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS uPI
2
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION and SILICON XTAL CORPORATION and GOOD
3
CAUSE appearing therefore,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Hogan Lovells US LLP is substituted into the above-
5
captioned matter as sole counsel of record for uPI and SXC in place of Haynes and Boone, LLP.
6
Haynes and Boone, LLP shall be removed from the service list and Court roll. Steven M.
7
Levitan, Edward C. Kwok, Jennifer M. Lantz, and Clark S. Stone of Hogan Lovells US LLP
8
have entered their appearance and are authorized to receive service of all pleadings, notices,
9
orders, and other papers on uPI and SXC’s behalf.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED:
11
12
January 8, 2013.
DATED: _________________
THE HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
Case No. 09-cv-5659 WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?