Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 2, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2010)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Doc. 36

Case3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document35

Filed07/28/10 Page1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DARIN W. SNYDER (SBN 136003) ([e-mail]) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Fl., San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] RYAN K. YAGURA (SBN 197619) ([e-mail]) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., BEST DATA PRODUCTS INC. D/B/A DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA, AND EASTCOM, INC. D/B/A XFX TECHNOLOGY, INC. YITAI HU (SBN 248085) ([e-mail]) KEVIN C. TROCK (SBN 161787) ([e-mail]) ALSTON + BIRD LLP 3000 El Camino Real, # 400, Palo Alto, CA 94306 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORP AND RICHTEK USA, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and RICHTEK USA, INC., Plaintiffs, v. uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., SAPPHIRE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, BEST DATA PRODUCTS INC. D/B/A DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA, and XFX TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendants.

Case No. CV 09-05659 WHA STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL STIPU PREJUDICE WITH LATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CV 09-05659 WHA
Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document35

Filed07/28/10 Page2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel to plaintiff Richtek Technology Corp and Richtek USA, Inc. ("Richtek") and counsel to defendants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ("AMD"), Best Data Products, Inc. d/b/a Diamond Multimedia, Inc. ("Diamond"), and Eastcom, Inc. D/B/A XFX Technology, Inc. ("XFX"), as follows: 1. All claims in the above-captioned action between Richtek and defendants AMD, Diamond, and XFX are dismissed with prejudice. 2. Each party will bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 3. This court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the Binding Term Sheet between the parties, dated May 27, 2010, of which this stipulation forms a part. DATED: July 28, 2010 DARIN W. SNYDER RYAN K. YAGURA O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Darin W. Snyder Darin W. Snyder Attorneys for Defendants ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., BEST DATA PRODUCTS INC. D/B/A DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA, AND XFX TECHNOLOGY, INC. DATED: July 28, 2010 YITAI HU KEVIN C. TROCK S. H. MICHAEL KIM ALSTON + BIRD LLP

By: /s/ Kevin C. Trock Kevin C. Trock Attorneys for Plaintiffs RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORP. and RICHTEK USA, INC.

-1-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CV 09-05659 WHA

Case3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document35

Filed07/28/10 Page3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SF1:799781.1

ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above-listed signatories.

By: /s/ Darin W. Snyder Darin W. Snyder The Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce settlement terms that have not been disclosed. Otherwise, the IT ISis dismissed with prejudice pursuant to stipulation. THE CLERK SHALL case SO ORDERED. CLOSE THE FILE. Dated: August 2, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Hon. William H. Alsup United States District Judge Dated: August 2, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CV 09-05659 WHA