Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 366

ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 3/1/2013. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, ET AL., 12 No. C-09-05659 WHA (DMR) ORDER Plaintiff(s), 13 v. 14 15 UPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, ET AL., 16 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 17 18 The court received Defendant Powerchip's request to allow its party representatives to 19 participate via telephone from Taiwan. Having reviewed the record in this case, the court would be 20 inclined to grant Powerchip's request. However, Powerchip did not indicate whether any party 21 objects to its request. Parties should file any objections by no later than Tuesday, March 5, 2013. 28 H 27 R NIA ED ORDER . Ryu onna M Judge D DONNA M. RYU E States C United R N Magistrate Judge F D IS T IC T O R RT 26 Dated: March 1, 2013 NO 25 O IT IS S FO 24 LI IT IS SO ORDERED. A 23 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 22 UNIT ED For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?