Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filing
366
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 3/1/2013. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
ET AL.,
12
No. C-09-05659 WHA (DMR)
ORDER
Plaintiff(s),
13
v.
14
15
UPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,
ET AL.,
16
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
17
18
The court received Defendant Powerchip's request to allow its party representatives to
19
participate via telephone from Taiwan. Having reviewed the record in this case, the court would be
20
inclined to grant Powerchip's request. However, Powerchip did not indicate whether any party
21
objects to its request. Parties should file any objections by no later than Tuesday, March 5, 2013.
28
H
27
R NIA
ED
ORDER
. Ryu
onna M
Judge D
DONNA M. RYU
E States
C
United R N Magistrate Judge
F
D IS T IC T O
R
RT
26
Dated: March 1, 2013
NO
25
O
IT IS S
FO
24
LI
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
23
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
22
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?