Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filing
370
ORDER granting requests to appear telephonically by Defendants Powerchip and Maxchip. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 03/07/13.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
ET AL.,
Plaintiff(s),
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
v.
12
13
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
POWERCHIP AND DEFENDANT
MAXCHIP’S REQUESTS TO APPEAR
BY TELEPHONE AT SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
UPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,
ET AL.,
14
No. C-09-05659 DMR
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
15
16
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
17
In the absence of objections, and good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the requests of
18
Defendants Powerchip Technology Corporation (“Powerchip”) and Maxchip Electronics
19
Corporation (“Maxchip”) to have their Taiwan-based party representatives appear by telephone at
20
the Settlement Conference scheduled for March 19, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.
21
Party representatives for Powerchip and Maxchip who are based in Taiwan may appear
22
telephonically, and shall be available starting at 2:00 pm Pacific Time (6:00 a.m. Taiwan time).
23
Counsel shall make all arrangements to enable their representatives to attend by phone. Powerchip
24
and Maxchip attorneys and their party representatives who are not based in Taiwan must appear in
25
person.
26
27
28
This order does not give counsel or party representatives permission to appear telephonically
at any subsequent settlement proceedings in this case.
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: March 7, 2013
5
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?