Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 370

ORDER granting requests to appear telephonically by Defendants Powerchip and Maxchip. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 03/07/13.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, ET AL., Plaintiff(s), 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 v. 12 13 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT POWERCHIP AND DEFENDANT MAXCHIP’S REQUESTS TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE UPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, ET AL., 14 No. C-09-05659 DMR Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 15 16 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 17 In the absence of objections, and good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the requests of 18 Defendants Powerchip Technology Corporation (“Powerchip”) and Maxchip Electronics 19 Corporation (“Maxchip”) to have their Taiwan-based party representatives appear by telephone at 20 the Settlement Conference scheduled for March 19, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. 21 Party representatives for Powerchip and Maxchip who are based in Taiwan may appear 22 telephonically, and shall be available starting at 2:00 pm Pacific Time (6:00 a.m. Taiwan time). 23 Counsel shall make all arrangements to enable their representatives to attend by phone. Powerchip 24 and Maxchip attorneys and their party representatives who are not based in Taiwan must appear in 25 person. 26 27 28 This order does not give counsel or party representatives permission to appear telephonically at any subsequent settlement proceedings in this case. 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: March 7, 2013 5 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?