Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filing
372
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION by Hon. William Alsup granting 367 Motion for Protective Order.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DARIN W. SNYDER (SB #136003)
dsnyder@omm.com
MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW (SB #242640)
msapoznikow@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
(415) 984-8700
Facsimile:
(415) 984-8701
Attorneys for Third Parties
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.,
XFX TECHNOLOGY, INC., and
BEST DATA PRODUCTS, INC. D/B/A
DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
et al.,
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiffs,
v.
uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,
et al.,
Case No. C09-05659 WHA
CORRECTED UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL
MATERIALS OF THIRD PARTIES
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.,
XFX TECHNOLOGY, INC., AND BEST
DATA PRODUCTS, INC. D/B/A
DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CORRECTED PROTECTIVE ORDER
RE: AMD, XFX, AND DIAMOND
NO. C09-05659 WHA
1
WHEREAS, third parties Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”), XFX Technology, Inc.
2
(“XFX”), and Best Data Products, Inc. d/b/a Diamond Multimedia (“Diamond”) disclosed
3
materials designated Confidential Business Information (“CBI”) to Plaintiff Richtek Technology
4
Corp. (“Richtek”) and Defendant uPI Semiconductor Corporation (“uPI”) in the International
5
Trade Commission (“ITC”) investigation and enforcement proceedings designated In the Matter of
6
Certain DC-DC Controllers And Products Containing The Same, Investigation No. 337-TA-698
7
(the “ITC Proceedings”), and
8
9
WHEREAS, the CBI materials were designated by AMD, XFX, and Diamond pursuant to
protective orders issued by the ITC, and
10
WHEREAS, pursuant to the protective orders issued in the ITC, and contingent on (i) entry
11
of this Protective Order and (ii) the application of the Stipulated Protective Order (Docket 119)
12
and the Order Approving Stipulated Protective Order Subject To Stated Conditions (Docket 130)
13
to their CBI materials, AMD, Diamond, and XFX have agreed to grant consent to uPI and Richtek
14
to use in this Action materials designated CBI by AMD, Diamond, and XFX in the ITC Actions,
15
and
16
17
WHEREAS, AMD, XFX, and Diamond jointly request that the Court enter this Protective
Order, and Richtek and uPI do not oppose this motion:
18
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any Party in this Action intending to file with the Court
19
(whether under seal or not) or disclose or discuss at any Court hearing (whether at trial or
20
otherwise) materials designated CBI in the ITC proceedings by AMD, Diamond, and XFX must
21
give advance notice of ten (10) business days to the third party that designated the CBI materials
22
through the undersigned counsel for AMD, Diamond, and XFX. If the third party that designated
23
the CBI materials in the ITC provides a written objection to the Party in this Action that seeks to
24
use the CBI materials within five (5) business days after receiving notice, and if the dispute cannot
25
be resolved after reasonable efforts to meet and confer, the third party that designated the CBI
26
materials in the ITC may file a motion to prevent the use of the CBI materials. Until such a
27
motion is resolved, the CBI materials that are the subject of the objection shall not be filed with
28
the Court, or disclosed, or discussed at any Court hearing in this Action.
CORRECTED PROTECTIVE ORDER
RE: AMD, XFX, AND DIAMOND
NO. C09-05659 WHA
1
2
Nothing in this Protective Order affects the admissibility (or not) in this Action of any
materials disclosed in the ITC proceedings.
3
4
5
6
PURSUANT TO UNOPPOSED MOTION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 18, 2013.
DATED: ____________________
Honorable William Alsup
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
DATED: February 28, 2013
DARIN W. SNYDER
MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
/s/ Michael Sapoznikow
Michael Sapoznikow
Attorneys for Third Parties
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.,
XFX TECHNOLOGY, INC., and
BEST DATA PRODUCTS, INC. D/B/A
DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CORRECTED PROTECTIVE ORDER
RE: AMD, XFX, AND DIAMOND
NO. C09-05659 WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?