Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 372

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION by Hon. William Alsup granting 367 Motion for Protective Order.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DARIN W. SNYDER (SB #136003) dsnyder@omm.com MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW (SB #242640) msapoznikow@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 Attorneys for Third Parties ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., XFX TECHNOLOGY, INC., and BEST DATA PRODUCTS, INC. D/B/A DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, et al., 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, v. uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, et al., Case No. C09-05659 WHA CORRECTED UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS OF THIRD PARTIES ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., XFX TECHNOLOGY, INC., AND BEST DATA PRODUCTS, INC. D/B/A DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CORRECTED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: AMD, XFX, AND DIAMOND NO. C09-05659 WHA 1 WHEREAS, third parties Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”), XFX Technology, Inc. 2 (“XFX”), and Best Data Products, Inc. d/b/a Diamond Multimedia (“Diamond”) disclosed 3 materials designated Confidential Business Information (“CBI”) to Plaintiff Richtek Technology 4 Corp. (“Richtek”) and Defendant uPI Semiconductor Corporation (“uPI”) in the International 5 Trade Commission (“ITC”) investigation and enforcement proceedings designated In the Matter of 6 Certain DC-DC Controllers And Products Containing The Same, Investigation No. 337-TA-698 7 (the “ITC Proceedings”), and 8 9 WHEREAS, the CBI materials were designated by AMD, XFX, and Diamond pursuant to protective orders issued by the ITC, and 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the protective orders issued in the ITC, and contingent on (i) entry 11 of this Protective Order and (ii) the application of the Stipulated Protective Order (Docket 119) 12 and the Order Approving Stipulated Protective Order Subject To Stated Conditions (Docket 130) 13 to their CBI materials, AMD, Diamond, and XFX have agreed to grant consent to uPI and Richtek 14 to use in this Action materials designated CBI by AMD, Diamond, and XFX in the ITC Actions, 15 and 16 17 WHEREAS, AMD, XFX, and Diamond jointly request that the Court enter this Protective Order, and Richtek and uPI do not oppose this motion: 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any Party in this Action intending to file with the Court 19 (whether under seal or not) or disclose or discuss at any Court hearing (whether at trial or 20 otherwise) materials designated CBI in the ITC proceedings by AMD, Diamond, and XFX must 21 give advance notice of ten (10) business days to the third party that designated the CBI materials 22 through the undersigned counsel for AMD, Diamond, and XFX. If the third party that designated 23 the CBI materials in the ITC provides a written objection to the Party in this Action that seeks to 24 use the CBI materials within five (5) business days after receiving notice, and if the dispute cannot 25 be resolved after reasonable efforts to meet and confer, the third party that designated the CBI 26 materials in the ITC may file a motion to prevent the use of the CBI materials. Until such a 27 motion is resolved, the CBI materials that are the subject of the objection shall not be filed with 28 the Court, or disclosed, or discussed at any Court hearing in this Action. CORRECTED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: AMD, XFX, AND DIAMOND NO. C09-05659 WHA 1 2 Nothing in this Protective Order affects the admissibility (or not) in this Action of any materials disclosed in the ITC proceedings. 3 4 5 6 PURSUANT TO UNOPPOSED MOTION, IT IS SO ORDERED. March 18, 2013. DATED: ____________________ Honorable William Alsup United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 DATED: February 28, 2013 DARIN W. SNYDER MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 /s/ Michael Sapoznikow Michael Sapoznikow Attorneys for Third Parties ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., XFX TECHNOLOGY, INC., and BEST DATA PRODUCTS, INC. D/B/A DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 CORRECTED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: AMD, XFX, AND DIAMOND NO. C09-05659 WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?