Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 393

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE. Response due February 9 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 4, 2015. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,
v.
uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,
POWERCHIP TECHNOLOGY CORP.,
MAXCHIP ELECTRONICS CORP., SILICON
XTAL CORPORATION, AMANDA DAI, and
JACKY LEE,

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE

Defendants.
/

17
18

No. C 09-05659 WHA

Defendant uPI Semiconductor Corporation argues that the stay should remain in place at

19

least until March 2, 2015, the deadline for it to file a petition for writ of certiorari.

20

By FEBRUARY 9 AT NOON, uPI shall please state whether (and by when) it will file a petition for

21

writ of certiorari. Also, Powerchip Technology Corporation’s position on the stay issue was not

22

included in the parties’ joint statement. All positions and authorities regarding lifting the stay

23

must be filed by FEBRUARY 9 AT NOON (and shall not exceed five pages).

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: February 4, 2015.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE