Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 393

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE. Response due February 9 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 4, 2015. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, POWERCHIP TECHNOLOGY CORP., MAXCHIP ELECTRONICS CORP., SILICON XTAL CORPORATION, AMANDA DAI, and JACKY LEE, REQUEST FOR RESPONSE Defendants. / 17 18 No. C 09-05659 WHA Defendant uPI Semiconductor Corporation argues that the stay should remain in place at 19 least until March 2, 2015, the deadline for it to file a petition for writ of certiorari. 20 By FEBRUARY 9 AT NOON, uPI shall please state whether (and by when) it will file a petition for 21 writ of certiorari. Also, Powerchip Technology Corporation’s position on the stay issue was not 22 included in the parties’ joint statement. All positions and authorities regarding lifting the stay 23 must be filed by FEBRUARY 9 AT NOON (and shall not exceed five pages). 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 4, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?