Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filing
471
ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE -- COUNT SEVEN OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, Motions terminated: 469 , 456 .. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/31/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2016)
1
[ALL COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGES]
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. C 09-05659 WHA
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE – COUNT SEVEN OF THE
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT;
v.
uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,
POWERCHIP TECHNOLOGY CORP.,
MAXCHIP ELECTRONICS CORP., SILICON
XTAL CORPORATION, AMANDA DAI, and
JACKY LEE,
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Hon. William Alsup
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order re:
-1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA
1
It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel for Plaintiff Richtek Technology Corporation
2
(“Richtek”) and counsel for Defendants uPI Semiconductor Corporation (“uPI”) and Silicon Xtal
3
Corporation (“SXC”), as follows:
4
1.
Count Seven, and only Count Seven, of the Third Amended Complaint against uPI and
SXC is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
5
6
2.
Each party will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees as to Count Seven.
7
3.
This dismissal of Count Seven resolves uPI and SXC’s pending motion for partial
judgment on the pleadings. D.I. 456.
8
9
4.
The hearing scheduled for April 21 is hereby VACATED.
10
11
[PROPOSED] ORDER
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated:
March 31, 2016.
15
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order re:
-2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?