Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 481

ORDER (AS MODIFIED) granting Defendants Maxchip's and SXC's request to appear by telephone at the Settlement Conference re 477 and 478 Letters. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/14/16. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Steven M. Levitan (Bar No. 148716) steve.levitan@hoganlovells.com Edward C. Kwok (Bar No. 144302) edward.kwok@hoganlovells.com HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100 Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 463-4000 Facsimile: (650) 463-4199 Christian E. Mammen (Bar No. 188454) chris.mammen@hoganlovells.com HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 3 Embarcadero Center, 15th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 374-2300 Facsimile: (415) 374-2499 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendants uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, SILICON XTAL CORPORATION, and MAXCHIP ELECTRONICS CORP. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, 20 21 22 v. uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, et al., 23 Case No. CV 09-05659 WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MAXCHIP’S AND DEFENDANT SXC’S REQUESTS TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (AS MODIFIED) Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CERTAIN REQUESTS TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 09-05659 WHA \\040496/000003 - 220684 v1 ORDER (AS MODIFIED) 1 2 Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the requests of Defendants Maxchip 3 Electronics Corporation (“Maxchip”) and Silicon Xtal Corporation (“SXC”) to have their party 4 representatives appear by telephone at the Settlement Conference scheduled for May 6, 2016 at 5 11:00 a.m. 6 Party representatives for Maxchip and SXC may appear telephonically. Party 7 representatives for Maxchip who are based in Taiwan shall be available starting at 2:30 p.m. 8 Pacific Time (5:30 a.m. Taiwan time). Counsel shall make all arrangements to enable their 9 representatives to attend by phone. Maxchip’s and SXC’s attorneys of record must appear in 13 S HON. DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge UNIT ED 15 16 17 NO 18 ED ORDER O IT IS S IFIED S MOD A RT 19 aM ge Donn Jud 20 H ER . Ryu 21 22 R NIA 4/14/16 Dated: __________________ RT U O 14 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T FO 12 LI 11 person. If the court concludes that the absence of representatives for Maxchip and SXC is interfering with the settlement conference, the court may continue the settlement conference and may order personal attendance by each party including the representatives for Maxchip and SXC. IT IS SO ORDERED. A 10 N D IS T IC T R OF C 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 \\040496/000003 - 220684 v1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CERTAIN REQUESTS TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 09-05659 WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?