Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filing
481
ORDER (AS MODIFIED) granting Defendants Maxchip's and SXC's request to appear by telephone at the Settlement Conference re 477 and 478 Letters. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/14/16. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Steven M. Levitan (Bar No. 148716)
steve.levitan@hoganlovells.com
Edward C. Kwok (Bar No. 144302)
edward.kwok@hoganlovells.com
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
(650) 463-4000
Facsimile:
(650) 463-4199
Christian E. Mammen (Bar No. 188454)
chris.mammen@hoganlovells.com
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
3 Embarcadero Center, 15th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 374-2300
Facsimile:
(415) 374-2499
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defendants uPI SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION, SILICON XTAL
CORPORATION, and MAXCHIP ELECTRONICS
CORP.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
20
21
22
v.
uPI SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION, et al.,
23
Case No. CV 09-05659 WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT MAXCHIP’S AND
DEFENDANT SXC’S REQUESTS TO
APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
(AS MODIFIED)
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CERTAIN REQUESTS TO
APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. CV 09-05659 WHA
\\040496/000003 - 220684 v1
ORDER (AS MODIFIED)
1
2
Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the requests of Defendants Maxchip
3
Electronics Corporation (“Maxchip”) and Silicon Xtal Corporation (“SXC”) to have their party
4
representatives appear by telephone at the Settlement Conference scheduled for May 6, 2016 at
5
11:00 a.m.
6
Party representatives for Maxchip and SXC may appear telephonically. Party
7
representatives for Maxchip who are based in Taiwan shall be available starting at 2:30 p.m.
8
Pacific Time (5:30 a.m. Taiwan time). Counsel shall make all arrangements to enable their
9
representatives to attend by phone. Maxchip’s and SXC’s attorneys of record must appear in
13
S
HON. DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
UNIT
ED
15
16
17
NO
18
ED
ORDER
O
IT IS S
IFIED
S MOD
A
RT
19
aM
ge Donn
Jud
20
H
ER
. Ryu
21
22
R NIA
4/14/16
Dated: __________________
RT
U
O
14
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
FO
12
LI
11
person.
If the court concludes that the absence of representatives for Maxchip and SXC is interfering
with the settlement conference, the court may continue the settlement conference and may order
personal attendance by each party including the representatives for Maxchip and SXC.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
10
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
\\040496/000003 - 220684 v1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CERTAIN REQUESTS TO
APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. CV 09-05659 WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?