Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 585

ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE by Hon. William Alsup granting 584 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Yitai Hu (SBN 248085) yitai.hu@alston.com Ryan W. Koppelman (SBN 290704) ryan.koppelman@alston.com ALSTON & BIRD LLP 1950 University Avenue, 5th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Tel.: 650-838-2026 Fax: 650-838-2001 Steven M. Levitan (SBN 148716) steve.levitan@hoganlovells.com HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100 Menlo Park, California 94025 Tel: (650) 463-4000 Fax: (650) 463-4199 Christian E. Mammen (SBN 188454) chris.mammen@hoganlovells.com HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 3 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94111 Tel: (415) 374-2300 Fax: (415) 374-2499 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963) elizabeth.rader@alston.com ALSTON & BIRD LLP The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1404 Tel.: 202-239-3300 Fax: 202-239-3333 Edward C. Kwok (SBN 144302) (ekwok@vlplawgroup.com) VLP Law Group LLP 19900 Price Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Tel: (408) 620-5501 Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Attorneys for Defendant uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, 20 21 22 23 Case No. C 09-05659 WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE v. uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, AMANDA DAI and JACKY LEE, Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER LEGAL02/36821852v1 -1- Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA 1 On November 25, 2016, Plaintiff Richtek Technology Corporation (“Richtek”) and Defendant 2 uPI Semiconductor Corporation (“uPI”) submitted a stipulation and joint motion to dismiss with 3 prejudice. Having considered this request, the Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED. 4 5 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims between Richtek and uPI shall be dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses relating to the claims between 7 Richtek and uPI (including attorney and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party 8 incurring same. 9 The Clerk shall please close the file. 10 11 12 13 Dated: November 29, 2016. 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER LEGAL02/36821852v1 -2- Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?