Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filing
585
ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE by Hon. William Alsup granting 584 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
Yitai Hu (SBN 248085)
yitai.hu@alston.com
Ryan W. Koppelman (SBN 290704)
ryan.koppelman@alston.com
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
1950 University Avenue, 5th Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Tel.: 650-838-2026
Fax: 650-838-2001
Steven M. Levitan (SBN 148716)
steve.levitan@hoganlovells.com
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100
Menlo Park, California 94025
Tel: (650) 463-4000
Fax: (650) 463-4199
Christian E. Mammen (SBN 188454)
chris.mammen@hoganlovells.com
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
3 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel: (415) 374-2300
Fax: (415) 374-2499
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963)
elizabeth.rader@alston.com
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
The Atlantic Building
950 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004-1404
Tel.: 202-239-3300
Fax: 202-239-3333
Edward C. Kwok (SBN 144302)
(ekwok@vlplawgroup.com)
VLP Law Group LLP
19900 Price Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Tel: (408) 620-5501
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
Attorneys for Defendant
uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
20
21
22
23
Case No. C 09-05659 WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
WITH PREJUDICE
v.
uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,
AMANDA DAI and JACKY LEE,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
LEGAL02/36821852v1
-1-
Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA
1
On November 25, 2016, Plaintiff Richtek Technology Corporation (“Richtek”) and Defendant
2
uPI Semiconductor Corporation (“uPI”) submitted a stipulation and joint motion to dismiss with
3
prejudice. Having considered this request, the Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED.
4
5
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims between Richtek and uPI shall be dismissed with
prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses relating to the claims between
7
Richtek and uPI (including attorney and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party
8
incurring same.
9
The Clerk shall please close the file.
10
11
12
13
Dated:
November 29, 2016.
14
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
LEGAL02/36821852v1
-2-
Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?