Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 77

ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO LIFT STAY. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 27, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)

Download PDF
Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al Doc. 77 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, and RICHTEK USA, INC., Plaintiffs, v. uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. / No. C 09-05659 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO LIFT STAY 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A mandatory stay was issued in this action on January 19, 2010, pending the final determination by the United States International Trade Commission ("ITC") in the matter of Certain DC-DC Controllers and Products Containing the Same, Investigation No. 337-TA-698 (Dkt. No. 22). On September 15, plaintiffs moved to lift the stay due to the termination of the ITC's investigation on September 9 (Dkt. No. 70). In that same motion, plaintiffs asked the Court to request a transfer of the ITC's record in the investigation for use in the instant case. The motion was noticed of a hearing on the normal 35-day briefing track. Since the basis of the instant motion is simply the termination of the ITC's investigation, a full briefing schedule is unnecessary. Any opposition to the instant motion must be filed by defendants BY NOON ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 30. Otherwise, the stay will be lifted. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 27, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?