Smith v. National City Bank of Indiana et al

Filing 16

ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO APRIL 30, 2010; REFERRING PARTIES TO ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2010) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/4/2010: # 1 cs) (ys, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants. / MARTHA B. SMITH, Plaintiff, No. C 09-5715 SI ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO APRIL 30, 2010; REFERRING PARTIES TO ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, who is representing herself, filed this action in state court. Defendant PNC Bank, National Association removed the case to this Court, and has filed motions to dismiss and to strike the complaint. The motions are scheduled for a hearing on March 19, 2010. Plaintiff has filed a letter with the Court requesting that the Court allow her time to find an attorney to represent her and to respond to defendant's motions. The Court grants plaintiff's request for an extension of time. The March 19, 2010 hearing is rescheduled to April 30, 2010 at 9:00 am. Plaintiff's response to the pending motions must be filed no later than April 9, 2010, and defendant's replies must be filed no later than April 16, 2010. The case management conference scheduled for April 16, 2010 is rescheduled April 30, 2010 at 2:30 pm. The Court also finds it appropriate to refer the parties to the Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution Program. The ADR Department shall contact the parties and arrange a conference to determine the appropriate ADR procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 3, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?