Logwood v. City of Berkeley et al
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 14, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2010)
Filed06/07/10 Page1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Zach Cowan, City Attorney, SBN 96372 Matthew J. Orebic, Deputy City Attorney, SBN 124491 BERKELEY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 2180 Milvia Street, Fourth Floor Berkeley, CA 94704 Telephone: (510) 981-6998 Facsimile: (510) 981-6960 Email: MOrebic@ci.berkeley.ca.us Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF BERKELEY and ELIZABETH BASHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARCELLA LOGWOOD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BERKELEY; ELIZABETH BASHAN, a police officer of the City of Berkeley, Defendants. No. C09-05729 WHA (ADR) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
STIPULATION Plaintiff Marcella Logwood, through David Beauvais, her attorney herein, and Defendants City of Berkeley and Elizabeth Bashan, through their attorney herein, Matthew J. Orebic, hereby stipulate that plaintiff's entire Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. Dated: June 7, 2010 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ David Beauvais DAVID BEAUVAIS Attorney for Plaintiff, MARCELLA LOGWOOD
/// /// /// ///
1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE NO. C09-05729 WHA (ADR)
Filed06/07/10 Page2 of 2
1 Dated: June 7, 2010 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE NO. C09-05729 WHA (ADR)
ZACH COWAN, City Attorney MATTHEW J. OREBIC, Deputy City Attorney By: /s/ Matthew J. Orebic MATTHEW J. OREBIC Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF BERKELEY and ELIZABETH BASHAN
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. S DISTRIC WILLIAM H. ALSUPD VE United StatesAPPRO Judge District
illiam A Judge W lsup
Dated: June 14, 2010.
F D IS T IC T O R
RT U O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?