Vaughn v. Potter

Filing 37

PRETRIAL ORDER (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2010)

Download PDF
Vaughn v. Potter Doc. 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It is hereby ORDERED pursuant to F.R.C.P. and the Local Rules of this Court: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT: December 16, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. Counsel must file a joint case management statement seven days in advance of the conference. DISCOVERY PLAN: Per F.R.Civ.P and Local Rules, subject to any provisions below. NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is January 14, 2011 DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS: 2/4/11; REBUTTAL: 3/4/11. Parties SHALL conform to Rule 26(a)(2). EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is May 13, 2011. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL be filed by March 11, 2011; Opp. Due March 25, 2011; Reply Due April 1, 2011; and set for hearing no later than April 15, 2011 at 9:00 AM. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: June 14, 2011 at 3:30 PM. JURY TRIAL DATE: July 11, 2011 at 8:30 AM., Courtroom 10, 19th floor. TRIAL LENGTH is estimated to be days. v. JOHN E POTTER, Defendant. / ROCHELLE VAUGHN, Plaintiff, No. C 09-05746 SI &C-10-0748 SECOND PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER SPECIAL DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL PROVISIONS: The court set the trial schedule in both cases as indicated above. The parties are ordered to participate in a further settlement conference with Magistrate-Judge Chen during the first two weeks in November 2010. The pretrial conference SHALL be attended by trial counsel prepared to discuss all aspects of the case, including settlement. Parties SHALL conform to the attached instructions. Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on any party subsequently joined in this action. Dated: SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?