Vaughn v. Potter

Filing 70

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ROCHELLE VAUGHN,

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 09-05746 SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

v.
PATRICK R. DONAHOE1
Defendant.

/

13
14

On May 13, 2011, the Court heard argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. At

15

the hearing, plaintiff stated that she had new evidence that would show that she was not totally disabled

16

The Court granted plaintiff the opportunity to present this evidence to the Court, and continued the

17

hearing until Friday, June 3, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. On May 18, 2011, plaintiff submitted a declaration

18

along with a doctor’s note. Defendant is hereby ORDERED to submit a response to the Court by 5:00

19

p.m. on Wednesday, June 1, 2011 addressing the impact of this new evidence on his motion for

20

summary judgment. The June 3 hearing remains scheduled as before.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

Dated: May 26, 2011
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge

26
27
28

1.
Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Postmaster General Patrick R.
Donahoe is substituted as defendant for former Postmaster General John E. Potter.