Cathcart et al v. Sara Lee Corporation et al

Filing 60

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND MOTION, DISCOVERY, AND MEDIATION DATES. Close of discovery on Labor Code sec. 514 and Motor Carrier Act exemptions - August 5, 2011. Deadline to file motion for summary judgment - A ugust 19, 2011, to be noticed for hearing October 7, 2011. Deadline to complete mediation - October 28, 2011. Deadline to file motion for class certification - March 23, 2012, to be noticed for hearing July 20, 2012. Case Management Conference is continued from August 10, 2012 to August 31, 2012.Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 19, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MAYER BROWN LLP JOHN NADOLENCO (SBN 181128) jnadolenco@mayerbrown.com JEROME JAUFFRET (SBN 159135) jjauffret@mayerbrown.com KRISTEN ROWSE (SBN 235294) krowse@mayerbrown.com 350 South Grand Avenue 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503 Telephone: (213) 229-9500 Facsimile: (213) 625-0248 7 8 9 10 Attorneys for Defendants SARA LEE CORPORATION, SARA LEE BAKERY GROUP and EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES, INC. 13 SPIRO MOSS LLP Ira Spiro (SBN 67641) Ira@spiromoss.com 11377 W. Olympic Blvd 5th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90064 Telephone: 310-235-2468 Facsimile: 310-235-2456 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 12 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 20 DAVID M. CATHCART, JAMES H. WHITEHEAD, ROBERT W. DECKER, DALE BALDISSERI, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 21 Plaintiff, 22 v. 25 SARA LEE CORPORATION, SARA LEE BAKERY GROUP, EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES, INC. (formerly sued as DOE 1) and DOES 2 through 20, 26 STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND MOTION, DISCOVERY, AND MEDIATION DATES [PROPOSED] ORDER 23 24 Case No. CV 09-5748 MMC The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney Complaint filed: December 8, 2009 Defendants. 27 28 STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND DATES CASE NO. CV 09-5748 MMC 700233130 1 2 3 The parties stipulate as set forth in the numbered paragraphs below, based on the following facts: The Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 33) set original deadlines in this matter. The discovery 4 and motion deadlines have previously been continued by stipulated order (see Docket Nos. 35, 5 44, 52, 56, and 58). The deadline to complete mediation has also been continued by stipulated 6 order (see Docket Nos. 54 and 58). The current deadlines are as follows: 7 A. Deadline for parties to complete mediation: August 5, 2011; 8 B. Close of discovery on Labor Code § 514 and Motor Carrier Act exemptions: July 8, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 2011; C. Deadline for filing of Defendants’ motion(s) for summary judgment on Labor Code § 514 and Motor Carrier Act exemptions: July 22, 2011; D. Deadline for filing Plaintiffs’ opposition to above motion(s) and cross-motion: August 12, 2011; E. Deadline for reply on Defendants’ motion(s) and opposition to cross-motion: August 19, 2011; 16 F. Hearing on above motion(s): September 9, 2011, 9:00 a.m.; 17 G. Deadline for Plaintiffs to file motion for class certification: March 2, 2012; 18 H. Deadline for Defendants to file opposition to motion for class certification: April 20, 19 2012; 20 I. Deadline for Plaintiffs to file reply on motion for class certification: June 8, 2012; 21 J. Hearing on motion for class certification: June 29, 2012, 9:00 a.m. 22 K. Case Management Conference: August 10, 2012. 23 The parties most recently stipulated (in May 2011) to extend the discovery and motion 24 deadlines in this matter due to a class action jury trial that Plaintiffs’ counsel was required to take 25 over on very short notice, three weeks before the start of trial. That trial has concluded, and the 26 parties have met and conferred regarding rescheduling the depositions of the named Plaintiffs 27 and of Defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6). The parties have scheduled 28 these depositions for the week of July 25, 2011, the nearest dates available due to scheduling 2 STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND DATES CASE NO. CV 09-5748 MMC 1 conflicts of both parties and counsel. To accommodate these depositions and the subsequent 2 filing of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the parties agree to an additional, short 3 extension of discovery and motion deadlines. 4 Further, the parties believe it would be extremely helpful to have the benefit of the 5 Court’s ruling on the initial motion(s) for summary judgment (potentially affecting the scope of 6 at least some of Plaintiffs’ claims) before conducting mediation in this case. Therefore, the 7 parties respectfully request that the Court consider a further continuance of the mediation 8 completion deadline to a date following the summary judgment hearing. 9 10 The parties presently believe extension of these deadlines and hearing dates as listed below is necessary and appropriate and will not prejudice either party. 11 WHEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE and request that the Court order that the 12 Scheduling Order (Docket Non. 33) be modified to reflect the deadlines listed below, or to set 13 forth dates chosen by the Court: 14 15 1. Close of discovery on Labor Code § 514 and Motor Carrier Act exemptions: extended from July 8, 2011 to August 5, 2011; 16 2. Deadline for filing of Defendants’ motion(s) for summary judgment on Labor Code § 17 514 and Motor Carrier Act exemptions: extended from July 22, 2011 to August 19, 18 2011; 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. Deadline for filing Plaintiffs’ opposition to above motion(s) and cross-motion: extended from August 12, 2011 to September 9, 2011; 4. Deadline for reply on Defendants’ motion(s) and opposition to cross-motion: extended from August 19, 2011 to September 16, 2011; 5. Hearing on above motion(s): continued from September 9, 2011 to October 7, 2011, 9:00 a.m.; 6. Deadline for parties to complete mediation: extended from August 5, 2011 (before hearing on motion for summary judgment) to October 28, 2011; 7. Deadline for Plaintiffs to file motion for class certification: extended from March 2, 2012 to March 23, 2012; 3 STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND DATES CASE NO. CV 09-5748 MMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8. Deadline for Defendants to file opposition to motion for class certification: extended from April 20, 2012 to May 11, 2012; 9. Deadline for Plaintiffs to file reply on motion for class certification: extended from June 8, 2012 to June 29, 2012; 10. Hearing on motion for class certification: continued from June 29, 2012 to July 20, 2012, 9:00 a.m. 11. Case Management Conference: continued from August 10, 2012 to August 31, 2012. SO STIPULATED. In compliance with General Order No. 45 (X), as filing party, Defendants attest that all 10 signatories below concur in the filing of this document. 11 DATED: June 30, 2011 MAYER BROWN LLP JOHN NADOLENCO JEROME JAUFFRET KRISTEN ROWSE 12 13 14 By: /s/ John Nadolenco John Nadolenco Attorneys for Defendants SARA LEE CORPORATION, SARA LEE BAKERY GROUP and EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES, INC. 15 16 17 18 19 DATED: June 30, 2011 SPIRO MOSS LLP 20 By: /s/ Ira Spiro Ira Spiro Attorneys for Plaintiffs 21 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER 23 24 SO ORDERED as stated in paragraphs 1 through 11 above. 25 26 DATED: July 19, 2011 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 27 28 4 STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND DATES CASE NO. CV 09-5748 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?