McCarty v. Astrue

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time to and including 10/27/2010 for plaintiff to file motions; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 10/18/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)

Download PDF
McCarty v. Astrue Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IAN M. SAMMIS Attorney at Law Cal. State Bar #45883 1108 Tamalpais Avenue #1 San Rafael, CA 94901 Tel.: 415-457-4200 Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION STEVEN L. McCARTY, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL C. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) CIVIL No.: C 09-05753 MHP ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING ) TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR ) REMAND ) ) 11 12 13 14 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 approval of the Court, that Plaintiff McCarty may have an extension of 14 days in which to file his motion for summary judgment or remand. Given the additional allegations provided to Defendant, the parties have agreed, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's filing is due on Wednesday, October 27, 2010, pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-5. /// /// McCARTY, EXT.MSJ AND/OR REMAND C 09-05753 MHP Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 13, 2010 S/Ian M. Sammis/ IAN M. SAMMIS Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: October 13, 2010 S/Kathryn R. Watson/ Kathryn R. Watson Assistant Regional Counsel and Attorney for Defendant ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 18 , 2010 ER N D IS T IC T R OF McCARTY, EXT.MSJ AND/OR REMAND C 09-05753 MHP A C LI FO arilyn H Judge M . Patel R NIA ________________________________ DERED SO OR MARILYN H. PATEL IT IS United States District Judge UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?