Starkey v. F/V Donita LLC et al

Filing 6

ORDER CONTINUING Case Management Conference to 4/26/2010 04:00 PM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 3/18/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 UNIT ED 3/18/2010 24 D A T E D : _________________ April 15, 2010 26 April ___, 2010 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the dates set by the Court in its Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference filed December 10, 2009, are hereby continued as follows: April 1, 2010 Last day to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR and discovery plan, to file ADR Certification, and to file either ADR Stipulation or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference; Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures, or state objection thereto, and to file Case Management Statement; and INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 4:00 in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, SF at ____am/pm. Having reviewed the Status Report and Request for Continuance of Case Management Conference filed by Plaintiff, and good cause appearing in support thereof; VICTOR STARKEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) F/V DONITA, LLC; MICHAEL E. ) MCCUTCHEON and ANN TIMMER, in ) personam, the F/V DONITA, her engines, tackle, ) apparel, etc., in rem, and DOES 1 through 20, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________ ) CASE NO. CV 09 5801 MHP [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 25 26 27 28 _______________________________ T h e Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER O R D E R FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEM E N T CONFERENCE N C a s e No. CV 09-5801 MHP D IS T IC T R OF A C LI FO arilyn Judge M l H. Pate R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?