Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading Deadline re 9 Stipulation. Deadline to file by 1/28/2010. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/29/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Andrew P. Bridges (SBN: 122761) Abridges@winston.com David S. Bloch (SBN: 184530) Dbloch@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, 39th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 Attorneys For Plaintiffs Claude M. Stern (SBN: 96737) claudestern@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES 555 Twin Dolphin Drive Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Patrick C. Doolittle (SBN: 203659) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES patrickdoolittle@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 Attorneys for Defendant UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA Winston & Strawn LLP 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ER N C O F 12/29/2009 D IS T IC T R UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTERSERVE, INC. dba TECHCRUNCH, a ) Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, ) INC., a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD., a Singapore ) company, ) Defendant. ) ) 1 Case No. CV-09-5812 JW (PVT) STIPULATION REGARDING RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE [Local Rule 6-1 (a)] STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE CASE NO. 09-CV-5812 A LI FO m Judge Ja es Ware R NIA 12 OO IT IS S RDERE D RT U O NO RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 The parties hereby stipulate as follows: 1. 2. Defendant Fusion Garage Pte. Ltd. was served on December 18, 2009 (Dkt. No. 7). The parties agree and stipulate pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 (a) that Defendant shall have until January 28, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. 3. Plaintiffs have indicated to Defendant that they may move or apply for expedited discovery. Defendant will not use this extension as a ground to object to Plaintiff's application for expedited discovery, though Defendant reserves the right to assert all other grounds, arguments and bases for why such expedited discovery is unwarranted and unnecessary. Dated: December 28, 2009 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Winston & Strawn LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 28, 2009 By: /s/David S. Bloch Andrew P. Bridges David S. Bloch Attorneys for Plaintiffs QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES By: /s/Patrick C. Doolittle Claude M. Stern Patrick C. Doolittle Attorneys for Defendant STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE 2 CASE NO. 09-CV-5812 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing Stipulation Regarding Responsive Pleading Deadline. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that the other signatories to this filing have concurred in this filing. Dated: December 28, 2009 Respectfully submitted, WINSTON & STRAWN LLP By: /s/ David S. Bloch David S. Bloch Attorney for Plaintiffs Winston & Strawn LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE 3 CASE NO. 09-CV-5812

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?