Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 196 Stipulation filed by CrunchPad, Inc., Fusion Garage PTE. LTD, Interserve, Inc. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/31/2011 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/10/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2011)
Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 2 firstname.lastname@example.org Evette Pennypacker (Bar No. 203515) 3 email@example.com Thomas R. Watson (Bar No. 227264) 4 firstname.lastname@example.org 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th floor 5 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 6 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 7 Joshua L. Sohn (Bar No. 250105) 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 8 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 9 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 10 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd. 11 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Andrew P. Bridges (Bar No.: 122761) 12 Abridges@winston.com David S. Bloch (SBN: 184530) 13 Dbloch@winston.com Matthew A. Scherb (Bar No. 237461) 14 email@example.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 15 101 California Street, 39th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 16 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs TechCrunch, Inc., et al. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 TECHCRUNCH, INC. a Delaware CASE NO. 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG) 21 corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, INC., a Delaware corporation, JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 22 ORDER CONTINUING CASE Plaintiffs, MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 23 vs. 24 FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD, a Singapore 25 company, 26 27 28
Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG) JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and 16-2(e), Plaintiffs TechCrunch, Inc. and CrunchPad, Inc.
2 (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and Defendant Fusion Garage PTE, Ltd. ("Defendant"), by and through 3 their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to continue the Initial Case Management 4 Conference scheduled for March 17, 2011. 5 6 1. Reason for the Request
The Court denied Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint on February 9,
7 2011 and, at the same time, set an Initial Case Management Conference for March 17, 2011. See 8 Dkt. 194. However, lead counsel for Defendant Fusion Garage is currently scheduled to argue 9 motions for summary judgment on March 17, 2011 in the case captioned Bedrock Computer 10 Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al., 6:09-cv-00269-LEDJDL (E.D. Tex.). 11 As a result, the parties have agreed to request a continuation of the Initial Case Management
12 Conference in this matter until March 31, 2011. 13 The parties will file a Case Management Conference statement and its ADR certifications by
14 March 24, 2011. 15 16 2. Prior Time Modifications
The following time modifications have been previously made in this case: time to file a
17 responsive pleading (Dkt. No. 16); motion to set the hearing dates on Fusion Garage's motion to 18 dismiss, to strike, and for a more definite statement ("motion to dismiss") and Plaintiffs' motion for 19 a preliminary injunction to May, 6, 2010 (Dkt. No. 45); motion to shorten time to hear Fusion 20 Garage's motion to compel documents to support its opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a 21 preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 55); setting new hearing date on Plaintiffs' motion for a 22 preliminary injunction and defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 64); granting extension of time 23 regarding briefing on Plaintiffs' motion to compel (Dkt. 178); and granting a brief extension of time 24 to comply with an order compelling the production of redacted source code (Dkt. 188). 25 26 27 28
Effect of Requested Modification
The requested modification will have no effect on the rest of the schedule in this action. So Stipulated.
Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG) -2JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this action, through their respective counsel of record,
2 AGREE AND HEREBY STIPULATE, if agreeable to the Court, to continue the Initial Case 3 Management Conference until March 31, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. The parties will submit a Case 4 Management Conference Statement and their ADR certifications by March 24, 2010. 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED. QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
7 Dated: March 9, 2011 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
By /s/ Thomas R. Watson Thomas R. Watson Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE., Ltd.
DATED: March 9, 2011
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
By /s/ Matthew A. Scherb Matthew A. Scherb Attorneys for Plaintiffs TechCrunch, Inc. and CrunchPad, Inc.
Pursuant to stipulation, it is SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 10, 2011
HON. RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG) -3JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?