Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 64

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 63 SETTING NEW HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Motion Hearing continued to 5/13/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco..Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/13/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2010)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) [e-mail] 2 Patrick Doolittle (Bar No. 203659) [e-mail] 3 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE. Ltd 7 8 9 10 11 INTERSERVE, INC. dba TECHCRUNCH, a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, 12 INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 14 vs. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

**E-Filed 4/13/10**

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

CASE NO. 09-cv-5812 RS STIPULATED REQUEST AND [xxxxxxxx] ORDER SETTING NEW HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND RELATED BRIEFING SCHEDULES Dept.: Hon. Richard Seeborg

15 FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD, a Singapore company, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction ("PI Motion"); WHEREAS, Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss, to Strike, or for a More Definite

22 Statement ("Motion to Dismiss"); 23 24 WHEREAS, the Court has set both motions for hearing on May 6, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties wish to take certain depositions in advance of the hearing on the PI

25 Motion and have presently scheduled such depositions during the week of April 19, 2010; and 26 WHEREAS, the parties ask the Court to reset the hearing date for May 13, 2010 with

27 opposition briefs due on April 26, 2010 and reply briefs due on May 3, 2010 notwithstanding the 28 Local Rules;
04049.51632/3438051.1

Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS STIPULATED REQUEST AND [xxxx] ORDER SETTING NEW HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

1

NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned counsel hereby CONSENT, STIPULATE and

2 JOINTLY REQUEST the following pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-7(b): 3 4 2010; 5 2. Defendant's Opposition to the PI Motion shall be due April 26, 2010 and Plaintiffs' 1. The hearing on the PI Motion and Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to May 13,

6 Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be due April 26, 2010. 7 3. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of their PI Motion shall be due on May 3, 2010 and

8 Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss shall be due May 3, 2010. 9 10 11 Dated: April 12, 2010 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/3438051.1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

By /S/ Patrick C. Doolittle Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE., Ltd.

DATED: April 12, 2010

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

By /S/ Andrew P. Bridges Attorneys for Plaintiffs Interserve, Inc. d/b/a TechCrunch and CrunchPad, Inc.

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ORDERED.

Dated: 4/13/10

The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Judge

Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS -2STIPULATION AND [xxxxxxxx] ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS