Zhai v. Napolitano et al

Filing 3

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/22/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 YUNFEI ZHAI, Plaintiff, v. JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., Defendants. / ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE No. C 09-05824 JSW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On December 11, 2009, a the Court issued a procedural order for immigration mandamus cases. Defendants were ordered to serve and file an answer within 60 days of receipt of service of the summons and complaint. However, there is no indication that Defendants have ever been served with the summons and complaint. Therefore, the Court HEREBY ORDERS PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE as to why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a written response by no later than May 6, 2010. Failure to respond to this Order shall result in dismissal of this matter without prejudice. If Plaintiff has already served the summons and complaint on Defendant, Plaintiff shall file a proof of service by no later than April 29, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 22, 2010 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?