Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 106

ORDER granting Dell and Motorola request for extention to file reponse to Mo. to Certify (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Richard S. Taffet (pro hac vice)
Kenneth I. Schacter (pro hac vice)
Jon R. Roellke (pro hac vice)
Colin C. West (SBN 184095)
Kristen A. Palumbo (SBN 215857)
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
[phone] (telephone)
[phone] (facsimile)
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
Sharp Corporation
Sharp Electronics Corporation
[additional parties and counsel listed
in signature block]

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
This Document Relates to Individual Cases No.
3:10-cv-01064 SI and 3:09-cv-5840-SI
DELL INC. and DELL PRODUCTS L.P.,

19
20
21

Plaintiffs,
v.
SHARP CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26

) MDL Case No. 3:07-md-1827-SI
)
) Dell Case No. 3:10-cv-01064-SI
)
) Motorola Case No. 3:09-cv-5840-SI
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JOINT STIPULATION OF
)
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DELL
)
AND MOTOROLA TO RESPOND
)
TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
)
CERTIFY UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

MOTOROLA, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

27
28
1

STIPULATION OF EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DELL AND MOTOROLA
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO CERTIFY

WHEREAS plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (collectively, “Dell”) have an individual

1
2

lawsuit (Case No. 3:10-cv-01064-SI) against defendants Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics

3

Corporation, Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Epson

4

Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America, Inc., HannStar Display Corporation,

5

Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba

6

Corporation and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. (collectively the “Dell Defendants”);
WHEREAS plaintiff Motorola, Inc. has an individual lawsuit (Motorola Case No. 3:09-cv-

7
8

5840-SI) against defendants AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi

9

Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation USA,

10

Inc., CMO Japan Co. Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture

11

Tubes Ltd., Tatung Company of America, Inc., HannStar Display Corporation, LG Display Co. Ltd.,

12

LG Display America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung

13

Electronics America, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Corporation,

14

Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America

15

Information Systems, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

16

(collectively the “Motorola Defendants”);
WHEREAS the Dell Defendants and Motorola Defendants are collectively referred to herein as

17
18

the “Stipulating Defendants”;
WHEREAS on April 13, 2011, the Dell Defendants filed a Motion to Certify the Court’s March

19
20

16, 2011 Order granting in part and denying in part the Dell Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss the

21

Dell Complaint for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (Dkt. No. 2648);
WHEREAS on April 13, 2011, the Motorola Defendants filed a Motion to Certify the Court’s

22
23

March 28, 2011 Order denying the Motorola Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss the Second

24

Amended Motorola Complaint for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (Dkt. No.

25

2649);

26
27

WHEREAS the Stipulating Defendants noticed hearings on their respective Motions to Certify
for May 20, 2011;

28
2
STIPULATION OF EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DELL AND MOTOROLA
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO CERTIFY

1
2
3

WHEREAS Dell and Motorola, Inc. each desire an additional amount of time to respond to the
Stipulating Defendants’ respective Motions to Certify;
WHEREAS, given the similarity of issues raised in the Motions to Certify, Dell, Motorola, Inc.,

4

and the Stipulating Defendants agree that it would promote judicial economy for these motions to be

5

heard on the same day;

6

THEREFORE, Dell, Motorola, Inc., and the Stipulating Defendants hereby agree as follows:

7

Dell and Motorola shall have until May 2, 2011 to respond to the Stipulating

8

Defendants’ respective Motions to Certify (Dkt. Nos. 2648 and 2649);

9

Stipulating Defendants shall have until May 13, 2011 to file replies in support of

10

Stipulating Defendants’ respective Motions to Certify (Dkt. Nos. 2648 and 2649);

11

The parties will request that the hearing date on these motions be reset for May 27,

12

2011 or the Court’s soonest available hearing date thereafter.

13
Respectfully submitted,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Dated: April 27, 2011

By:

/s/ Jon R. Roellke
Jon R. Roellke (pro hac vice)
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
2020 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006-1806
[phone] (telephone)
Richard S. Taffet (pro hac vice)
Kenneth I. Schacter (pro hac vice)
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
399 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022-4689
[phone] (telephone)
Colin C. West (SBN 184095)
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
[phone] (telephone)

26
27

Attorneys for Defendants
Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corp.

28
3
STIPULATION OF EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DELL AND MOTOROLA
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO CERTIFY

1

Dated: April 27, 2011

By:

2
3
4
5
6

/s/ Melvin R. Goldman
Melvin R. Goldman
Stephen P. Freccero
Derek F. Foran
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
[phone] (telephone)
David L. Meyer
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Suite 6000
Washington, DC 20006-1888

7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants
Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson
Electronics America, Inc.

10
11
12
Dated: April 27, 2011
13
14
15

By:

/s/ John H. Chung
John H. Chung (pro hac vice)
WHITE & CASE LLP
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
[phone] (telephone)

16
17
18
19

Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice)
Kristen J. McAhren (pro hac vice)
WHITE & CASE LLP
701 Thirteenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-3807
[phone] (telephone)

20
21
22
23

Attorneys for Defendants
Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display
Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Electronic
Components, Inc. and Toshiba America
Information Systems, Inc.

24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION OF EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DELL AND MOTOROLA
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO CERTIFY

1

Dated: April 27, 2011

By:

2
3
4
5

/s/ Kent Michael Roger
Kent Michael Roger
Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105
[phone] (telephone)
Counsel for Defendants
Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices
(USA), Inc., and Hitachi, Ltd

6
7
8 Dated: April 27, 2011

By:

9
10
11
12
13

/s/ Ramona M. Emerson
Hugh F. Bangasser (pro hac vice)
Ramona M. Emerson (pro hac vice)
Christopher M. Wyant (pro hac vice)
K&L GATES LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900
Seattle, WA 98104-1158
[phone] (telephone)
Jeffrey L. Bornstein
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (telephone)

14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant
HannStar Display Corporation

17
18
19 Dated: April 27, 2011
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

By:

/s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz
Michael R. Lazerwitz (pro hac vice)
Jeremy J. Calsyn (SBN 205062)
Lee F. Berger (SBN 222756)
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON
LLP
2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20006
[phone] (telephone)
[phone] (facsimile)
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America,
Inc.

28
5
STIPULATION OF EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DELL AND MOTOROLA
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO CERTIFY

1

Dated: April 27, 2011

By:

2
3
4
5
6

/s/ Christopher A. Nedeau
Christopher A. Nedeau
Carl L. Blumenstein
Allison Dibley
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (telephone)
Attorneys for Defendants
AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics
Corporation America, Inc.

7
8
9 Dated: April 27, 2011

By:

10
11
12
13

/s/ Patrick J. Ahern
Patrick J. Ahern
BAKER & MCKENZIE, L.L.P.
130 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601
[phone] (telephone)
Attorneys for Defendants
Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. and Tatung
Company of America, Inc.

14
15
16 Dated: April 27, 2011
17
18
19
20
21
22

By:

/s/ Christopher B. Hockett
Christopher B. Hockett
DAVIS, POLK & WARDWELL LLP
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, CA 94025
[phone] (telephone)
Attorneys for Defendants
Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics
Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.
CMO Japan Co. Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc. and
Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.

23
24
25
26
27
28
6
STIPULATION OF EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DELL AND MOTOROLA
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO CERTIFY

1

Dated: April 27, 2011

By:

2
3
4
5

/s/ Robert D. Wick
Robert D. Wick (pro hac vice)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street, 35th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (telephone)
Timothy C. Hester (pro hac vice)
Derek Ludwin (pro hac vice)
Theodore P. Metzler (pro hac vice)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
1201 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, D.C. 20004
[phone] (telephone)

6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and
Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Dated: April 27, 2011

By:

/s/ Rodney J. Ganske
Michael P. Kenny, Esq.
[e-mail]
Debra D. Bernstein, Esq.
[e-mail]
Rodney J. Ganske, Esq.
[e-mail]
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
Tel: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Steven D. Hemminger (SBN 110665)
[e-mail]
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
275 Middlefield Road
Suite 150
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell
Products L.P.

26
27
28
7
STIPULATION OF EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DELL AND MOTOROLA
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO CERTIFY

1

Dated: April 27, 2011

2
3
4
5
6

By:

/s/ Joshua C. Stokes
Joshua C. Stokes (SBN 121539)
Jason C. Murray (SBN 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (SBN 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116

7
8
9
10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff Motorola, Inc.

12
13

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the signatories

14
thereto has been obtained.
15
16
17
18 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20

5/2/11
Dated: ____________, 2011

_______________________________________
Honorable Susan J. Illston

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
STIPULATION OF EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DELL AND MOTOROLA
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO CERTIFY