Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 219

ORDER granting extension of time to respond (#4167) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)

1 SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
GARY L. HALLING, Cal. Bar No. 66087
JAMES L. McGINNIS, Cal. Bar No. 95788
MICHAEL W. SCARBOROUGH, Cal. Bar No. 203524
MONA SOLOUKI, Cal. Bar No. 215145
TYLER M. CUNNINGHAM, Cal. Bar No. 243694
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4106
Telephone:
415-434-9100
Facsimile:
415-434-3947
E-mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

10 Attorneys for Defendants

SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. and
11 SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17 In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)

Master Docket No. M:07-cv-1827-SI

18

(Case No. 3:09-cv-05840-SI)

19 This Document Relates to: 3:09-cv-5840-SI

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

20

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,

21
22
23
24

Plaintiffs,
vs.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
W02-WEST:5TMC1\404160270.1
Case No. 3:09-cv-05840-SI

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

Whereas, plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc. ("Motorola") filed a third amended complaint

2 ("TAC") in the above-captioned case on July 22, 2011, naming Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and
3 Samsung SDI America, Inc. (together, "SDI") as defendants;
4

Whereas, SDI filed a motion to dismiss claims in the TAC, which the Court denied on

5 November 14, 2011;
6

Whereas, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), the date for SDI to

7 answer the TAC is currently on or about November 30, 2011;
8

Whereas, counsel for SDI requires additional time to review the TAC and prepare its

9 answer thereto;
10

Whereas Motorola's First Set of Interrogatories to SDI includes Interrogatory No. 9, which

11 references SDI's affirmative defenses to the TAC;
12

Whereas counsel for SDI requires additional time to review and respond to Interrogatory

13 No. 9 following the preparation, service and filing of its answer to the TAC;
14

Whereas counsel for Motorola wishes to preserve the option of moving to compel a

15 response to Interrogatory No. 9;
16

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

17 undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Motorola on the one hand, and SDI on
18 the other hand, as follows:
19

1.

The deadline for SDI to answer the TAC will be December 19, 2011.

20

2.

The deadline for SDI to respond to Interrogatory No. 9 will be January 9, 2012.

21

3.

The deadline for Motorola to move to compel a response with respect to

22 Interrogatory No. 9 will be February 6, 2012.
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1W02-WEST:5TMC1\404160270.1
Case No. 3:09-cv-05840-SI

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

1 Dated: November 21, 2011
/s/ Tyler M. Cunningham
Tyler Mark Cunningham (SBN 243694)
Michael W. Scarborough (SBN 203524)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Counsel for Defendants Samsung SDI America, Inc.
and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.

9
10

Dated: November 21, 2011
__/s/ Nathanial J. Wood________

11

Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547)
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15
16
17

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

18
19
20
21
22

Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc.

23
24
25

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of
this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

26
27
28
-2W02-WEST:5TMC1\404160270.1
Case No. 3:09-cv-05840-SI

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
11/22

3 Dated: ________________, 2011
4
5
6
Susan Illston, United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3W02-WEST:5TMC1\404160270.1
Case No. 3:09-cv-05840-SI

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT