Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 222

ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Motorola's Third Amended Complaint by Philips Electronics North America Corporation. (#4178) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172) (beeneyg@sullcrom.com) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004-2498 Telephone: (212) 558-4000 Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) (cullenb@sullcrom.com) Shawn Joe Lichaa (SBN 250902) (lichaas@sullcrom.com) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 Attorneys for Defendant Philips Electronics North America Corporation 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 Master File No. M 07-1827 SI Case No. 09-cv-5840 SI IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION 16 MDL No. 1827 17 18 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTOROLA’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT This Document Relates To: Case No. 09-cv-5840 SI 19 20 MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, 21 22 v. 23 24 25 AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTOROLA’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI 1 Whereas Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) filed its Third Amended 2 Complaint (“TAC”) in the above-captioned matter on July 22, 2011, naming Philips Electronics North 3 America Corporation (“PENAC”) as a defendant; 4 5 6 7 Whereas PENAC moved to dismiss the claims in the TAC on September 12, 2011, and the Court denied that motion on November 16, 2011; Whereas, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A), PENAC’s deadline to answer the TAC is currently on or around November 30, 2011; 8 Whereas PENAC requires additional time to prepare its answer to the TAC; 9 Whereas Motorola’s First Set of Interrogatories to PENAC included Interrogatory No. 7, 10 which sought information related to the factual bases for PENAC’s affirmative defenses to the TAC; 11 Whereas PENAC previously responded to Interrogatory No. 7 indicating that PENAC 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 had not yet filed an answer and therefore had not yet asserted affirmative defenses; Whereas Motorola requests that PENAC update its response to Interrogatory No. 7 after PENAC answers the TAC; Whereas Motorola wishes to preserve the option of moving to compel a response to Interrogatory No. 7; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Motorola and PENAC, through their respective undersigned counsel, as follows: 19 1. The deadline for PENAC to answer the TAC will be December 20, 2011; 20 2. The deadline for PENAC to respond to Interrogatory No. 7 will be January 13, 21 2012, without prejudice to PENAC’s right to supplement, amend, or correct its 22 response to Interrogatory No. 7 as PENAC becomes aware of additional 23 information; and 24 25 3. The deadline for Motorola to move to compel a response with respect to Interrogatory No. 7 will be February 13, 2012. 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP -2STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTOROLA’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI 1 Dated: November 23, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 2 /s/ Brendan P. Cullen Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) Shawn Joe Lichaa (SBN 250902) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 3 4 5 6 7 Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004-2498 Telephone: (212) 558-4000 Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 8 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant Philips Electronics North America Corporation 11 12 /s/ Nathanial J. Wood Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547) Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St. 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213-622-4750 Facsimile: 213-622-2690 Email: nwood@crowell.com jmurray@crowell.com Jstokes@crowell.com 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: 202-624-2500 Facsimile: 202-628-5116 Email: jhoward@crowell.com jmurphy@crowell.com 20 21 22 23 24 25 Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc. 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Pursuant to General Order No. 45, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. -3STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTOROLA’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 11/23 Dated: _________________, 2011 _______________________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston United Stated District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP -4STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTOROLA’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?