Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
222
ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Motorola's Third Amended Complaint by Philips Electronics North America Corporation. (#4178) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172)
(beeneyg@sullcrom.com)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004-2498
Telephone: (212) 558-4000
Facsimile:
(212) 558-3588
Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
(cullenb@sullcrom.com)
Shawn Joe Lichaa (SBN 250902)
(lichaas@sullcrom.com)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone: (650) 461-5600
Facsimile:
(650) 461-5700
Attorneys for Defendant Philips Electronics North America Corporation
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
Master File No. M 07-1827 SI
Case No. 09-cv-5840 SI
IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
16
MDL No. 1827
17
18
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTOROLA’S THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT
This Document Relates To:
Case No. 09-cv-5840 SI
19
20
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., et al.,
Plaintiff,
21
22
v.
23
24
25
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTOROLA’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI
1
Whereas Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) filed its Third Amended
2
Complaint (“TAC”) in the above-captioned matter on July 22, 2011, naming Philips Electronics North
3
America Corporation (“PENAC”) as a defendant;
4
5
6
7
Whereas PENAC moved to dismiss the claims in the TAC on September 12, 2011, and
the Court denied that motion on November 16, 2011;
Whereas, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A), PENAC’s deadline to answer the TAC
is currently on or around November 30, 2011;
8
Whereas PENAC requires additional time to prepare its answer to the TAC;
9
Whereas Motorola’s First Set of Interrogatories to PENAC included Interrogatory No. 7,
10
which sought information related to the factual bases for PENAC’s affirmative defenses to the TAC;
11
Whereas PENAC previously responded to Interrogatory No. 7 indicating that PENAC
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
had not yet filed an answer and therefore had not yet asserted affirmative defenses;
Whereas Motorola requests that PENAC update its response to Interrogatory No. 7 after
PENAC answers the TAC;
Whereas Motorola wishes to preserve the option of moving to compel a response to
Interrogatory No. 7;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Motorola and
PENAC, through their respective undersigned counsel, as follows:
19
1.
The deadline for PENAC to answer the TAC will be December 20, 2011;
20
2.
The deadline for PENAC to respond to Interrogatory No. 7 will be January 13,
21
2012, without prejudice to PENAC’s right to supplement, amend, or correct its
22
response to Interrogatory No. 7 as PENAC becomes aware of additional
23
information; and
24
25
3.
The deadline for Motorola to move to compel a response with respect to
Interrogatory No. 7 will be February 13, 2012.
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
-2STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTOROLA’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI
1
Dated: November 23, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
2
/s/ Brendan P. Cullen
Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
Shawn Joe Lichaa (SBN 250902)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone: (650) 461-5600
Facsimile:
(650) 461-5700
3
4
5
6
7
Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004-2498
Telephone: (212) 558-4000
Facsimile:
(212) 558-3588
8
9
10
Attorneys for Defendant Philips Electronics
North America Corporation
11
12
/s/ Nathanial J. Wood
Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547)
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St. 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: 213-622-4750
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: nwood@crowell.com
jmurray@crowell.com
Jstokes@crowell.com
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: 202-624-2500
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: jhoward@crowell.com
jmurphy@crowell.com
20
21
22
23
24
25
Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc.
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.
-3STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTOROLA’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
11/23
Dated: _________________, 2011
_______________________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
United Stated District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
-4STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTOROLA’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?