Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 267

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL (#4585). Signed by Judge ILLSTON on 1/19/12. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

11
12

Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI

18
19

This Document Relates To:

20

Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., C 09-5840 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING
PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO MOVE TO
COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN
DISCOVERY

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
& 52:(//
0 25,1* //3
$772 51(< 6 $7 /$:

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07
MD-1827 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY

1

Defendants Chi Mei Corp., Chimei Innolux Corp. (“Chimei Innolux”); Chi Mei

2

Optoelectronics Corp. USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co. Ltd.; Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.; Nexgen

3

Mediatech USA, Inc. (collectively, “Chi Mei”) and Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”)

4

stipulate as follows:

5
6

WHEREAS Motorola served a Set of Interrogatories on Chi Mei and a set of Requests for
Production of Documents on Chimei Innolux on November 4, 2011 (the “Discovery”);

7
8

WHEREAS Chi Mei provided Responses and Objections to the Discovery on December
8, 2011;

9
10

WHEREAS the parties are meeting and conferring regarding Chi Mei’s Responses and
Objections to the Discovery;

11

WHEREAS Chi Mei previously agreed to permit Motorola additional time to move to

12

compel further responses to the Discovery and the Court entered an Order on December 16, 2011

13

setting January 6, 2012 as the deadline to file motions to compel as to the Discovery, and later

14

entered an order further extending the motion to compel deadline to January 20, 2012;

15

WHEREAS the parties desire additional time to meet and confer to resolve their disputes

16

regarding the Discovery, and Chi Mei has agreed to provide Motorola additional time to move to

17

compel.

18

THEREFORE, Chi Mei and Motorola, by their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate

19

and agree as follows:

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

& 52:(//
0 25,1* //3
$772 51(< 6 $7 /$:

-1-

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07 MD-1827 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY

1
2

The deadline for Motorola to move to compel further responses to the Discovery shall be
extended to January 27, 2012.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Dated: January 17, 2012
/s/ Nathanial J. Wood
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)
R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)
Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice)
ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP
1875 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-580-8821
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc.

24
25
26
27
28
& 52:(//
0 25,1* //3
$772 51(< 6 $7 /$:

-2-

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07 MD-1827 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY

1
/s/ Jason M. Bussey
2
James G. Kreissman (SBN 206740)
Harrison J. Frahn IV (SBN 206822)
Jason M. Bussey (SBN 227185)
Michael R. Lizano (SBN 246222)
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2550 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Attorney for Defendants Chi Mei Corporation, Chimei
Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA,
Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd, Nexgen Mediatech, Inc. and
Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.

10
11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15

1/18
Dated: ________________, 2012

16
17

_________________________________

18

Hon. Susan Illston, United States District Judge

19

DCACTIVE-17333038.1

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
& 52:(//
0 25,1* //3
$772 51(< 6 $7 /$:

-3-

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07 MD-1827 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY