Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 304

ORDER by Judge Illston signed on 3/22/12 granting 5260 Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI; granting 178 Stipulation in case 3:10-cv-04945-SI REGARDING RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION OF PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION AND FACT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF (w/signature). Signed by Judge Illston on 3/22/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: 202-624-2500 Facsimile: 202-628-5116 Email: jhoward@crowell.com jmurphy@crowell.com 10 Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213-622-4750 Facsimile: 213-622-2690 Email: jmurray@crowell.com jstokes@crowell.com 11 Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc. 12 [Additional counsel listed on signature page] 7 8 9 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI 18 19 This Document Relates To: 20 Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., C 09-5840 SI THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION OF PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION AND FACT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 21 22 Target Corporation, et al., v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., 3:10-cv-4945 SI 23 24 25 26 27 28 & 52:(// 0 25,1* //3 MASTER DOCKET NO. 07-M-1827 SI $772 51(<6 $7 /$: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF FOR PENAC DEPOSITION 1 Defendant Philips Electronics North America Corporation (“PENAC”) and Plaintiffs 2 Motorola Mobility, Inc.; Target Corp.; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corp.; Old Comp Inc.; 3 Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corp; and Newegg Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) stipulate as follows: WHEREAS on November 2, 2011, Plaintiffs initially served a notice of deposition of 4 5 PENAC pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) (“November 2, 2011 30(b)(6) 6 Notice”); WHEREAS the Court previously extended the time for Plaintiffs to take the deposition of 7 8 PENAC to April 30, 2012; WHEREAS PENAC is still diligently working to produce documents to Plaintiffs, and 9 10 expects to complete its production in March 2012; 11 12 WHEREAS Plaintiffs and PENAC have met and conferred regarding scheduling the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of PENAC; 13 WHEREAS the parties agree that the discovery cutoff should be further extended in order 14 to permit PENAC time to complete its production and Plaintiffs time to review the produced 15 documents before the deposition; and 16 17 THEREFORE, PENAC and Plaintiffs, by their respective, undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 18 1. The fact discovery cutoff date of December 8, 2011 set forth in the Order 19 Modifying Pretrial Schedule for “Track One” Direct Action Plaintiff and State Attorney General 20 Cases (MDL Dkt. No. 3110) is extended up to and including June 1, 2012, solely as to the 21 deposition of PENAC. 22 23 2. therein. 24 25 PENAC shall retain its right to object to any subsequent notice and the topics 3. If disputes arise at the deposition, Plaintiffs will have five court days to move to compel further responses. 26 4. 27 /// 28 Unless expressly provided herein, nothing in this Stipulation and Order is intended /// & 52:(// 0 25,1* //3 $772 51(<6 $7 /$: -1- MASTER DOCKET NO. 07-M-1827 SI STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF FOR PENAC DEPOSITION 1 to modify any other Order of the Court or the Special Master, nor does this order prevent any 2 party from seeking further modifications to such orders. 3 Dated: March 22, 2012 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 /s/ Nathanial J. Wood Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214) Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213-622-4750 Facsimile: 213-622-2690 Email: jmurray@crowell.com jstokes@crowell.com nwood@crowell.com Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: 202-624-2500 Facsimile: 202-628-5116 Email: jhoward@crowell.com jmurphy@crowell.com Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice) R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice) Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice) ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP 1875 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: 202-580-8822 Facsimile: 202-580-8821 Email: adams@adamsholcomb.com holcomb@adamsholcomb.com leonardo@adamsholcomb.com Counsel for Plaintiffs Motorola Mobility, Inc., Target Corp.; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corp.; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corp; and Newegg Inc. 25 26 27 28 & 52:(// 0 25,1* //3 $772 51(<6 $7 /$: -2STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF FOR PENAC DEPOSITION CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI 1 2 /s/ Brendan P. Cullen 3 Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 cullenb@sullcrom.com 4 5 6 7 Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004-2498 Telephone: (212) 558-4000 Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 beeneyg@sullcrom.com 8 9 10 11 Counsel for Defendant Philips Electronics North America Corporation 12 13 14 Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 3/22 Dated: ________________, 2012 19 20 Susan Illston, United States District Judge 21 DCACTIVE-17896765.1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 & 52:(// 0 25,1* //3 $772 51(<6 $7 /$: -3STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF FOR PENAC DEPOSITION CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?