Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 306

ORDER SETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION SCHEDULE: 1. Defendants shall submit the Motion by April 4, 2012. The page limit for the Memorandum in support of the Motion shall be 35 pages. 2. Motorola shall submit its Opposition to the Motion by May 18, 20 12. The page limit for the Opposition shall be 45 pages. 3. Defendants shall submit a Reply by June 15, 2012. The page limit for the Reply shall be 30 pages. 4. The Motion shall be heard on July 13, 2012. Motions terminated: ( 305 in 3:09-cv-058 40-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER on Briefing Schedule for Summary Judgment Motion Addressing Plaintiff's Claims for Injuries in Foreign Markets filed by Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, ([53 13] in 3:07-md-01827-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER on Briefing Schedule for Summary Judgment Motion Addressing Plaintiff's Claims for Injuries in Foreign Markets filed by Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 7/13/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Susan Illston.. Signed by Judge Illston on 3/27/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MELVIN R. GOLDMAN (CA SBN 34097)
[e-mail]
STEPHEN P. FRECCERO (CA SBN 131093)
[e-mail]
DEREK F. FORAN (CA SBN 224569)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendants EPSON IMAGING
DEVICES CORPORATION and EPSON
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No.: 3:07-MD-1827-SI
Case No. 09-cv-5840-SI
MDL No. 1827

This Document Relates to:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION ADDRESSING
PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS FOR
INJURIES IN FOREIGN MARKETS

16
17
18
19
20

Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., C 09-5840 SI

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 09-CV-5840-SI; 3:07-MD-1827-SI
sf-3120328

1

The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) and

2

defendants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei

3

Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co.,

4

Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc. and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.

5

and Tatung Company of America, Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics

6

America, Inc., HannStar Display Corporation, LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co.,

7

Ltd., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung

8

Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and

9

Samsung SDI America, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation and

10

Sharp Electronics Corporation, and Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.,

11

Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

12

(“Defendants”), parties to the above-entitled action, hereby stipulate as follows:

13

WHEREAS Defendants will file a Joint Motion for Summary Judgment addressing

14

Plaintiff’s claims for injuries in foreign markets under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement

15

Act (the “Motion”);

16
17
18
19

WHEREAS the Motion involves issues of fact and law that cannot be adequately
presented in 25 pages;
WHEREAS Motorola and Defendants have agreed that an orderly schedule of the briefing
would be most efficient for the Court and the Parties;

20

THEREFORE the Parties agree as follows:

21

1.

22
23

Memorandum in support of the Motion shall be 35 pages.
2.

24
25

28

Motorola shall submit its Opposition to the Motion by May 18, 2012. The page
limit for the Opposition shall be 45 pages.

3.

26
27

Defendants shall submit the Motion by April 4, 2012. The page limit for the

Defendants shall submit a Reply by June 15, 2012. The page limit for the Reply
shall be 30 pages.

4.

The Motion shall be heard on July 13, 2012, or at such time as the Court may
choose.

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 09-CV-5840-SI ; 3:07-MD-1827-SI
sf-3120328

1

1
2

Dated: March 27, 2012

MELVIN R. GOLDMAN
STEPHEN P. FRECCERO
DEREK F. FORAN
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

3
By:
4
5

/s/ Derek F. Foran
DEREK F. FORAN
Attorneys for Defendants
Epson Imaging Devices Corporation
and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

6
7

Also filed on behalf of AU Optronics
Corporation and AU Optronics
Corporation America, Chi Mei
Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation,
Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO
Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.
and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.,
Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. and Tatung
Company of America, Inc., HannStar
Display Corporation, LG Display
America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd.,
Philips Electronics North America
Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and
Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Samsung SDI
America, Inc., and Sanyo Consumer
Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation
and Sharp Electronics Corporation, and
Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile
Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America
Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba
America Information Systems, Inc.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

JEFFREY H. HOWARD
JEROME A. MURPHY
JASON C. MURRAY
JOSHUA C. STOKES
CROWELL & MORING LLP

23
24
25
26

By:

/s/ Jason C. Murray
JASON C. MURRAY
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Motorola Mobility, Inc.

27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 09-CV-5840-SI ; 3:07-MD-1827-SI
sf-3120328

2

1

Attestation: I, Derek F. Foran, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

2

obtained from co-signatory Jason C. Murray.

3
4

Dated: March 27, 2012

By:

/s/ Derek F. Foran

5
6
7

[PROPOSED ORDER]

8
9

Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation set forth above, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12
13

Dated:

3/27/12
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 09-CV-5840-SI ; 3:07-MD-1827-SI
sf-3120328

3