Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
455
ORDER granting stipulation of dismissal 6729 . Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 9/18/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
Master Docket No. C M:07-01827 SI
16
In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
MDL No. 1827
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER
This Document Relates To:
18
19
Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corp., et al., No. 09-cv-5840-SI
20
21
22
23
24
The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:
1.
Claims asserted by Plaintiff Motorola Mobility LLC, formerly known as Motorola
25
Mobility, Inc., against Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics
26
America, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil
27
Procedure.
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
2.
Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
[Proposed] Order
Case No. 07-01827 SI
1
2
3.
This Order does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiff against any other
defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18th
Sept
This ____ day of ______, 2012
6
7
Hon. Susan Y. Illston
United States District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
-2-
[Proposed] Order
Case No. 07-01827-SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?