Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 455

ORDER granting stipulation of dismissal 6729 . Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 9/18/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Master Docket No. C M:07-01827 SI 16 In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 1827 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER This Document Relates To: 18 19 Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp., et al., No. 09-cv-5840-SI 20 21 22 23 24 The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows: 1. Claims asserted by Plaintiff Motorola Mobility LLC, formerly known as Motorola 25 Mobility, Inc., against Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics 26 America, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil 27 Procedure. 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW 2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. [Proposed] Order Case No. 07-01827 SI 1 2 3. This Order does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiff against any other defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18th Sept This ____ day of ______, 2012 6 7 Hon. Susan Y. Illston United States District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW -2- [Proposed] Order Case No. 07-01827-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?