Luque et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 102

ORDER to enlarge page limitation for plaintiffs' reply re 101 Stipulation, filed by Joe Lewis Luque, Herman Richardson. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/14/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2010)

Luque et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Doc. 102

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

(Counsel listed on following pages)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOE LEWIS LUQUE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AT&T CORP., et al., Defendants. 3:09CV5885 (CRB) STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATION FOR PLAINTIFFS' REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL COLLECTIVE ACTION CERTIFICATION AND ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO THE COLLECTIVE ACTION CLASS

Case No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB) ­ STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATION

1

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Counsel for Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque, Herman Richardson, and the Plaintiff Class: THOMAS MARC LITTON (Cal. State Bar No. 119985) SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] [e-mail] STEVEN L. WITTELS (N.Y. State Bar No. 2004635) DAVID W. SANFORD (N.Y. State Bar No. 457933) ANDREW MELZER (N.Y. State Bar No. 4270682) SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor New York, New York 10019 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] MICHAEL RAM (Cal. State Bar No. 104805) KARL OLSON (Cal. State Bar No. 104760) RAM & OLSON LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] EDMOND CLARK (Conn. State Bar No. 418915) LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK 83 Scotland Avenue Madison, Connecticut 06443 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail]

Case No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB) ­ STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATION

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Counsel for Defendants AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and AT&T Communications of California, Inc.: J. AL LATHAM, JR. (Cal. State Bar No. 071605) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838) JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 248073) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-3441 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] WILLIAM CORY BARKER (Georgia State Bar No. 037727) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 600 Peachtree Street, N.E., 24th Floor Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail]

Case No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB) ­ STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATION

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 7-4(b), Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque, Herman Richardson, the Plaintiff class and Defendants AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and AT&T Communications of California, Inc., acting through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in support of their Motion for Conditional Collective Action Certification and Issuance of Notice to the Collective Action Class is due October 15, 2010. 2. Due the volume of evidence in the AT&T Defendants' opposition to Plaintiffs' motion, Plaintiffs have requested that they be allowed to file a memorandum in support of their motion that is 30 pages long (i.e. 5 pages longer than the parties' previous so-ordered stipulation, filed prior to filing of defendants' opposition). 3. Defendants have agreed to this extension. 4. Based on the foregoing, the parties believe there is good cause for the Court to enlarge the page limitations for Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in support of their Motion for Conditional Collective Action Certification and Issuance of Notice to the Collective Action Class.

DATED: October 13, 2010

SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP By: /Steven L. Wittels/ Steven L. Wittels Attorneys for Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque, Herman Richardson, and the Plaintiff Class

DATED: October 13, 2010

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP By: /Jeffrey D. Wohl/ Jeffrey D. Wohl

Case No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB) ­ STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATION

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Attorneys for Defendants AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Co., and AT&T Communications of California, Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, this ___ day of October 2010. 14

UNIT ED

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

S

S DISTRICT TE C ________________________________ TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

Case No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB) ­ STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATION

A

C

LI

FO
5

harle Judge C

s R. Bre

yer

R NIA

RDERE U.S. T IS SO O District Judge I

D

RT U O

NO

RT

H