Luque et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 147

SCHEDULING ORDER re 146 Stipulation, filed by AT&T Communications of California, Inc., AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 146 Stipulation,. Motions due by 1/17/2012. Responses due by 2/14/2012. Replies due by 3/12/2012. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/27/2011. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2011)

1

(Counsel listed on following pages)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

JOE LEWIS LUQUE AND HERMAN
RICHARDSON, Individually and On Behalf of
All Others Similarly Situated

14

Plaintiffs,

15
16
17

No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

vs.
AT&T CORP., PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE
CO. d/b/a AT&T CALIFORNIA, AND AT&T
COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA,
INC.,

18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL_US_W # 68145731.1

SCHEDULING ORDER
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

1

Counsel for Plaintiff Joe Lewis Luque and Herman Richardson:

2

JANETTE WIPPER (Cal. State Bar No. 275264)
SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

STEVEN L. WITTELS (N.Y. State Bar No. 2004635)
JEREMIAH FREI-PEARSON (N.Y. State Bar No. 4232922)
STANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP
1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
MICHAEL RAM (Cal. State Bar No. 104805)
KARL OLSON (Cal. State Bar No. 104760)
RAM & OLSON LLP
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
EDMOND CLARK (Conn. State Bar No. 418915)
LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK
83 Scotland Avenue
Madison, Connecticut 06443
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL_US_W # 68145731.1

SCHEDULING ORDER
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

1

Counsel for Defendants AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and
AT&T Communications of California, Inc.:

2
3
4
5

J. AL LATHAM, JR. (Cal. State Bar No. 071605)
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10

JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838)
JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 248073)
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
55 Second Street, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-3441
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14

WILLIAM CORY BARKER (Georgia State Bar No. 037727)
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
600 Peachtree Street, N.E., 24th Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL_US_W # 68145731.1

SCHEDULING ORDER
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

1

On the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s Order Granting Motion for Conditional Collective Action

3

Certification (Docket No. 122) be and hereby is modified, and that the following is adopted as the

4

Court’s scheduling order in this action:

5

1.

Non-expert fact discovery to be concluded by October 3, 2011.

6

2.

Plaintiffs’ expert disclosures to be completed by October 24, 2011.

7

3.

Defendants’ expert disclosures to be completed by November 21, 2011.

8

4.

Expert rebuttal reports to be submitted by December 9, 2011.

9

5.

Expert discovery to be concluded by December 20, 2011.

10

6.

Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification under Rule 23, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

11
7.

13

14, 2012.
8.

15

18

9.

A further scheduling conference to be set by the Court for a date that is at least 30 days
after the Court rules on plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.

Dated: May 27 , 2011.

RT
U
O

19

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

UNIT
ED

S

____________________________________
Charles R. Breyer
United States District RED
DEJudge

20
21

RT

23

ER

er
R. Brey

H

24

OR

harles
Judge C

NO

22

O
IT IS S

25

R NIA

17

March 12, 2012.

FO

16

Plaintiffs’ reply brief in support of their motion for class certification to be filed by

LI

14

Defendants’ opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for class certification to be filed by February

A

12

to be filed by January 17, 2012.

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

26
27
28
LEGAL_US_W # 68145731.1

SCHEDULING ORDER
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)