Luque et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
Filing
185
ORDER granting 180 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Brief Page Limit filed by Joe Lewis Luque, Herman Richardson. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/28/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2012)
Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page1 of 6
1
(Counsel listed on following pages)
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
JOE LEWIS LUQUE AND HERMAN
RICHARDSON, Individually and On Behalf
of All Others Similarly Situated,
8
9
10
Plaintiffs,
No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB)(JCS)
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEF PAGE LIMIT
v.
12
AT&T CORP., PACIFIC BELL
TELEPHONE CO. d/b/a AT&T
CALIFORNIA, AND AT&T
COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA,
INC.,
13
Defendants.
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT
LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)
Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page2 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Counsel for Plaintiffs:
JANETTE WIPPER (Cal. State Bar No. 275264)
SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 795-2020
Facsimile: (415) 795-2021
jwipper@swhlegal.com
STEVEN L. WITTELS (N.Y. State Bar No. 2004635)(Pro Hac Vice)
SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP
1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: (646) 402-5650
Facsimile: (646) 402-5651
swittels@swhlegal.com
MICHAEL RAM (Cal. State Bar No. 104805)
KARL OLSON (Cal. State Bar No. 104760)
RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI LLP
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 433-4949
Facsimile: (415) 433-7311
mram@rocklawcal.
comkolson@rocklawcal.com
EDMOND CLARK (Conn. State Bar No. 418915)(Pro Hac Vice)
LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK
83 Scotland Avenue
Madison, Connecticut 06443
Telephone: (203) 245-4602
Facsimile: (203) 245-9734
Eclarkmadisonlaw@aol.com
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT
LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)
Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page3 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Counsel for Defendants:
J. AL LATHAM, JR. (Cal. State Bar No. 071605)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (213) 683-6000
Facsimile: (213) 627-0705
allatham@paulhastings.com
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838)
JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 248073)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-3441
Telephone: (415) 856-7000
Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
jeffmichalowski@paulhastings.com
WILLIAM CORY BARKER (Georgia State Bar No. 037727)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
600 Peachtree Street, N.E., 24th Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
Telephone: (404) 815-2400
Facsimile: (404) 815-2424
corybarker@paulhastings.com
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT
LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)
Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page4 of 6
1
Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque and Herman Richardson and defendants Pacific Bell
2
Telephone Company, AT&T Corp., and AT&T Communications of California, Inc., acting
3
through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
4
1.
The parties have mediated all claims in this action and have reached a class
5
settlement that is subject to Court approval. The parties have also reached a settlement of the
6
claims in Lawson et al. v. BellSouth Telecomm., Inc., 1:09-CV-3528-JEC (N.D. Ga.).
7
2.
The parties have diligently worked to finalize the settlement papers and motion for
8
preliminary approval. In connection with the request for preliminary approval of the settlement,
9
Plaintiffs will submit a twenty three (23) page unopposed memorandum of law, exclusive of
10
11
summary of argument, title pages, indexes of cases, table of contents, and exhibits.
3.
In accordance with this Court’s Standing Orders (no. 5) dated July 12, 2012, the
12
parties hereby stipulate to extend the length of the memorandum of law in support from fifteen
13
(15) pages to twenty three (23), subject to the Court’s approval.
14
Dated: August 24, 2012.
15
16
JANETTE WIPPER
STEVEN L. WITTELS
SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP
MICHAEL RAM
KARL OLSON
RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI LLP
17
18
EDMOND CLARK
LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK
19
By:
20
21
/s/ Janette Wipper
Janette Wipper
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Joe Lewis Luque and Herman Richardson
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3
1
STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)
Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page5 of 6
1
Dated: August 24, 2012.
3
J. AL LATHAM, JR.
JEFFREY D. WOHL
JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI
WILLIAM CORY BARKER
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
4
By:
2
5
6
/s/ William C. Barker
William C. Barker
Attorneys for Defendants
AT&T Corp,, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and
AT&T Communications of California, Inc.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3
2
STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)
Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page6 of 6
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
On the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,
3
IT IS ORDERED that the page limit for the memorandum of law in support of Plaintiffs’
4
unopposed motion for preliminary approval of settlement is hereby extended to twenty three (23)
5
pages, exclusive of title pages, indexes of cases, table of contents, summary of argument, and
6
exhibits.
UNIT
ED
S
8
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
____________________________________
Dated: August __, 2012.
28
10
O ORD
IT IS S
11
yer
s R. Bre
NO
RT
ER
14
A
H
13
harle
Judge C
LI
12
R NIA
Charles R. Breyer
United States District Judge
ERED
9
FO
7
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?