Luque et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 185

ORDER granting 180 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Brief Page Limit filed by Joe Lewis Luque, Herman Richardson. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/28/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page1 of 6 1 (Counsel listed on following pages) 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 JOE LEWIS LUQUE AND HERMAN RICHARDSON, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 8 9 10 Plaintiffs, No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB)(JCS) JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEF PAGE LIMIT v. 12 AT&T CORP., PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO. d/b/a AT&T CALIFORNIA, AND AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., 13 Defendants. 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3 U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS) Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Counsel for Plaintiffs: JANETTE WIPPER (Cal. State Bar No. 275264) SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 795-2020 Facsimile: (415) 795-2021 jwipper@swhlegal.com STEVEN L. WITTELS (N.Y. State Bar No. 2004635)(Pro Hac Vice) SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (646) 402-5650 Facsimile: (646) 402-5651 swittels@swhlegal.com MICHAEL RAM (Cal. State Bar No. 104805) KARL OLSON (Cal. State Bar No. 104760) RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 433-4949 Facsimile: (415) 433-7311 mram@rocklawcal. comkolson@rocklawcal.com EDMOND CLARK (Conn. State Bar No. 418915)(Pro Hac Vice) LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK 83 Scotland Avenue Madison, Connecticut 06443 Telephone: (203) 245-4602 Facsimile: (203) 245-9734 Eclarkmadisonlaw@aol.com 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3 U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS) Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Counsel for Defendants: J. AL LATHAM, JR. (Cal. State Bar No. 071605) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 683-6000 Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 allatham@paulhastings.com JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838) JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 248073) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com jeffmichalowski@paulhastings.com WILLIAM CORY BARKER (Georgia State Bar No. 037727) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 600 Peachtree Street, N.E., 24th Floor Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Telephone: (404) 815-2400 Facsimile: (404) 815-2424 corybarker@paulhastings.com 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3 U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS) Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page4 of 6 1 Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque and Herman Richardson and defendants Pacific Bell 2 Telephone Company, AT&T Corp., and AT&T Communications of California, Inc., acting 3 through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 4 1. The parties have mediated all claims in this action and have reached a class 5 settlement that is subject to Court approval. The parties have also reached a settlement of the 6 claims in Lawson et al. v. BellSouth Telecomm., Inc., 1:09-CV-3528-JEC (N.D. Ga.). 7 2. The parties have diligently worked to finalize the settlement papers and motion for 8 preliminary approval. In connection with the request for preliminary approval of the settlement, 9 Plaintiffs will submit a twenty three (23) page unopposed memorandum of law, exclusive of 10 11 summary of argument, title pages, indexes of cases, table of contents, and exhibits. 3. In accordance with this Court’s Standing Orders (no. 5) dated July 12, 2012, the 12 parties hereby stipulate to extend the length of the memorandum of law in support from fifteen 13 (15) pages to twenty three (23), subject to the Court’s approval. 14 Dated: August 24, 2012. 15 16 JANETTE WIPPER STEVEN L. WITTELS SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP MICHAEL RAM KARL OLSON RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI LLP 17 18 EDMOND CLARK LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK 19 By: 20 21 /s/ Janette Wipper Janette Wipper Attorneys for Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque and Herman Richardson 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3 1 STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS) Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page5 of 6 1 Dated: August 24, 2012. 3 J. AL LATHAM, JR. JEFFREY D. WOHL JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI WILLIAM CORY BARKER PAUL HASTINGS LLP 4 By: 2 5 6 /s/ William C. Barker William C. Barker Attorneys for Defendants AT&T Corp,, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and AT&T Communications of California, Inc. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3 2 STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS) Case3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document180 Filed08/24/12 Page6 of 6 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 On the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 3 IT IS ORDERED that the page limit for the memorandum of law in support of Plaintiffs’ 4 unopposed motion for preliminary approval of settlement is hereby extended to twenty three (23) 5 pages, exclusive of title pages, indexes of cases, table of contents, summary of argument, and 6 exhibits. UNIT ED S 8 RT U O S DISTRICT TE C TA ____________________________________ Dated: August __, 2012. 28 10 O ORD IT IS S 11 yer s R. Bre NO RT ER 14 A H 13 harle Judge C LI 12 R NIA Charles R. Breyer United States District Judge ERED 9 FO 7 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEGAL_US_W # 72081351.3 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?